Earthquake triggering processes
Posted by EQF on January 30, 2003 at 18:31:07:

The following is most of the text of a report which I just posted to a number of Internet Newsgroups including sci.geo.earthquakes. This is a follow-up to a report which was posted to them on January 9, 2003.

This is information for scientists and others around the world who are interested in the subjects of earthquake triggering and forecasting. At the end of the report there is also a comment regarding geomagnetic storms and weather systems.

The first report in this series which was posted to a number of Internet Newsgroups on January 9, 2003 proposed that rapid changes in the acceleration of the Earth in space might be helping trigger some earthquakes.

Much of the text of that report has been temporarily stored on the following Web page:

http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/111.html#Acceleration

Additional research that I have done since then appears to me to be supportive of that theory. And if that that theory is in fact accurate then the following could be what is happening with at least some earthquakes:

*** Processes such as the movement of tectonic plates relative to one another cause strain to build in fault zones until their rock layers are about ready to fracture.

*** As the Earth and moon rotate about their shared center of mass each month and the Earth and sun do the same each year, the Earth is accelerated in different directions.

*** The rate of that acceleration is constantly changing. And that introduces constantly changing amounts of stress into the Earth's crust. During time windows when that stress is at a high point it can help weaken already strained fault zones.

*** As the Earth rotates on its North and South Pole axis each day relative to the sun and to the moon additional stress waves or "Pressure Waves" travel from east to west. Crests and troughs associated with them can at times be around the same locations as ocean tide or Solid Earth Tide crests and troughs.

*** When a Pressure Wave crest or trough hits one of those already strained fault zones at just the right angle it can weaken it sufficiently that it begins to fracture, and an earthquake occurs.

*** Stress inducing acceleration time windows appear to last for several days. There are two major windows each month about 14 days apart. And there are two less important windows about 7 days after each of those major windows.

*** Stress inducing Pressure Wave time windows may be active for perhaps 10 minutes at a time. And a simplified picture would propose that there are usually four of those windows, roughly 6 hours apart each day.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH WAS DISCUSSED IN THAT FIRST REPORT

It discussed the possibility of comparing MICA computer program related data and Solid Earth Tide computer program data. What I wanted to determine is if that is possible. Discussions regarding that subject matter which I have been having with geophysics personnel indicate to me that such comparisons cannot be easily made for the following reasons:

MICA program data relate to the movement of the Earth as a rigid object in space as it is affected (primarily) by the sun and moon gravities. And program data are essentially for all locations on and inside the Earth at the same time. Solid Earth Tide data programs generate data for specific locations on or inside the Earth as they are affected by various tides etc. In theory the two types of data are linked as the tides result from the sun and moon gravitational pulls on the Earth. But for most purposes those data would have to be regarded as being independent of one another.

THEORIES REGARDING HOW EARTHQUAKES ARE BEING TRIGGERED

It appears to me that one of the main reasons that scientists have never been able to propose a widely accepted theory for how earthquakes are being triggered is because there are so few who have the expertise in the various, necessary areas of science. In part to demonstrate that this is the case I am going to ask the following question. In my personal opinion, any geophysicist should be able to answer it. But I would be a little surprised if any could without first consulting with an expert in this field.

QUESTION: With the "acceleration" type data which Solid Earth Tide programs generate, do those data refer to the force of gravity at the specified location? Or are they referring to acceleration related to the up and down movement of the ground associated with the Solid Earth Tide?

My own best present guess is that they are referring to ground movement related acceleration rather than changes in the force of gravity.

WEATHER RELATED COMMENT

Something which I have discussed in the past is the possibility that solar storm (others have also proposed this) and perhaps earthquake fault event related geomagnetic storm activity might at times be affecting the Earth's weather systems, perhaps even encouraging some tornados to be spawned. I cannot point to any specific groups doing research on this, but I have been hearing rumors that researchers are beginning to look into the possibility that the solar storms, at least, are at times affecting the weather through a geomagnetic storm link. The following is an older report which discusses this subject:

http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/112.html#Forecasting-Tornados



Follow Ups:
     ● Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  11:53:04 - 1/31/2003  (17897)  (3)
        ● Earthquakes and the Solid Earth Tide - research paper - EQF  12:58:06 - 2/3/2003  (17952)  (4)
           ● Re: Research Results - Earthquakes Not Influenced By Tides - John Vidale  10:50:51 - 2/6/2003  (17977)  (0)
           ● Using the right types of earthquake triggering research data - EQF  01:27:02 - 2/5/2003  (17961)  (0)
           ● Re: Earthquakes and the Solid Earth Tide - research paper - Don in Hollister  23:49:23 - 2/3/2003  (17956)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquakes and the Solid Earth Tide - research paper - EQF  01:27:11 - 2/5/2003  (17962)  (0)
           ● Just a spacing entry - NT - EQF  13:17:54 - 2/3/2003  (17953)  (0)
        ● Sounds Like Plagiarism - Petra Challus  13:24:15 - 1/31/2003  (17899)  (2)
           ● Re: Sounds Like Plagiarism - Canie  16:08:24 - 2/1/2003  (17926)  (1)
              ● Please delete this thread section - EQF  21:56:02 - 2/1/2003  (17935)  (3)
                 ● Re: Please delete this thread section - EQF  02:25:33 - 2/2/2003  (17940)  (0)
                 ● Hold The Posts, Please - Let's Vote - Petra Challus  00:00:19 - 2/2/2003  (17939)  (0)
                 ● Re: Please delete this thread section - Don in Hollister  23:20:15 - 2/1/2003  (17936)  (1)
                    ● Re: Please delete this thread section - EQF  23:32:04 - 2/1/2003  (17937)  (1)
                       ● Re: Please delete this thread section - Don in Hollister  23:51:45 - 2/1/2003  (17938)  (0)
           ● Not in my opinion - EQF  18:43:49 - 1/31/2003  (17904)  (1)
              ● Re: Not in my opinion- Ahhhh - Petra Challus  19:44:06 - 1/31/2003  (17907)  (1)
                 ● Re: Not in my opinion- Ahhhh - EQF  19:54:38 - 1/31/2003  (17910)  (1)
                    ● The Whole Story - Petra Challus  20:09:41 - 1/31/2003  (17911)  (1)
                       ● Re: The Whole Story - EQF  20:49:32 - 1/31/2003  (17913)  (1)
                          ● Re: The Whole Story - Petra Challus  21:10:48 - 1/31/2003  (17916)  (1)
                             ● Re: Time to stop the arguing - Canie  19:13:41 - 2/1/2003  (17930)  (1)
                                ● Re: Time to stop the arguing - Don in Hollister  20:43:24 - 2/1/2003  (17934)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Time to stop the arguing - Canie  09:02:59 - 2/2/2003  (17941)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Time to stop the arguing - EQF  13:35:09 - 2/2/2003  (17944)  (0)
        ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  12:37:34 - 1/31/2003  (17898)  (1)
           ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Canie  14:41:48 - 1/31/2003  (17900)  (2)
              ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  19:44:46 - 1/31/2003  (17908)  (0)
              ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  15:17:15 - 1/31/2003  (17901)  (1)
                 ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  18:22:31 - 1/31/2003  (17902)  (2)
                    ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Roger Hunter  19:23:30 - 1/31/2003  (17906)  (1)
                       ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - RQF  20:33:16 - 1/31/2003  (17912)  (1)
                          ● Typo - should be EQF not RQF NT - EQF  20:52:20 - 1/31/2003  (17914)  (0)
                    ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  18:42:33 - 1/31/2003  (17903)  (1)
                       ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  19:02:00 - 1/31/2003  (17905)  (1)
                          ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  19:45:07 - 1/31/2003  (17909)  (1)
                             ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  20:58:17 - 1/31/2003  (17915)  (1)
                                ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  22:20:37 - 1/31/2003  (17917)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  18:38:09 - 2/1/2003  (17929)  (0)