Re: Teconic plate rock and roll
Posted by Canie on January 31, 2003 at 14:41:48:

Maybe he could use the word 'hypothesis' which would make it all correct at that point?

Many people make this common error.

Canie

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  19:44:46 - 1/31/2003  (17908)  (0)
     ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  15:17:15 - 1/31/2003  (17901)  (1)
        ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  18:22:31 - 1/31/2003  (17902)  (2)
           ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Roger Hunter  19:23:30 - 1/31/2003  (17906)  (1)
              ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - RQF  20:33:16 - 1/31/2003  (17912)  (1)
                 ● Typo - should be EQF not RQF NT - EQF  20:52:20 - 1/31/2003  (17914)  (0)
           ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  18:42:33 - 1/31/2003  (17903)  (1)
              ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  19:02:00 - 1/31/2003  (17905)  (1)
                 ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  19:45:07 - 1/31/2003  (17909)  (1)
                    ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  20:58:17 - 1/31/2003  (17915)  (1)
                       ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - Don in Hollister  22:20:37 - 1/31/2003  (17917)  (1)
                          ● Re: Teconic plate rock and roll - EQF  18:38:09 - 2/1/2003  (17929)  (0)