Hi All:

See the link. Has this method ever been formally evaluated ? Seems it would be more 'mainstream' if it was so useful....
-----------------------------------------------

The first question expresses that earthquake clouds exist objectively. They look different from weather clouds and meteorology can not explain how they form. Moreover, relying on that cloud [1], I predicted the 6.1 Afghanistan earthquake to the US Geological Survey with a time probability 13% on January 5, 1998 correctly [2]. This practice offers a reliable example to demonstrate that earthquakes can be predicted and earthquake clouds exist indeed.

• http://quake.exit.com/A020202.html