|
False Positives |
What about false positives? I have not heard much about that these days. Seems to me that if a person is predicting by physical symptoms then false positives would be important, but if Don is using a more scientific approach then false positives might not be as big a factor...False positives meaning a significant quake happens in an area where Don is located, but no predicted quake posted. Follow Ups: ● Re: False Positives - Lowell 07:07:55 - 12/7/2001 (11663) (2) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 11:35:19 - 12/7/2001 (11701) (2) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 17:11:02 - 12/7/2001 (11724) (1) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 17:39:01 - 12/7/2001 (11730) (0) ● Re: False Positives - Lowell 15:28:38 - 12/7/2001 (11718) (3) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 17:17:09 - 12/7/2001 (11726) (2) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 23:08:03 - 12/7/2001 (11739) (0) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 17:44:06 - 12/7/2001 (11732) (0) ● definitions - Roger Hunter 16:58:07 - 12/7/2001 (11723) (0) ● Re: False Positives - Canie 16:18:06 - 12/7/2001 (11721) (1) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 17:20:05 - 12/7/2001 (11727) (0) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 08:22:28 - 12/7/2001 (11676) (1) ● Re: False Positives - Lowell 11:56:19 - 12/7/2001 (11705) (1) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 12:32:14 - 12/7/2001 (11709) (1) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 17:24:01 - 12/7/2001 (11728) (2) ● Re: False Positives - Canie 19:53:51 - 12/7/2001 (11736) (1) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 23:16:56 - 12/7/2001 (11740) (0) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 17:50:22 - 12/7/2001 (11734) (0) |
|