Re: False Positives
Posted by bobshannon.org on December 07, 2001 at 08:22:28:

Now I am really lost....You said:
"""A "miss" occurs when an earthquake occurs which was not forecast."""

But the number of EQ's which happen without a prediction are in the dozens or more...How can you determine which is which? And shouldn't "false alarm" just be called a miss? And who determines which quake meets a significant set of matching parameters? Is it like consensus???


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: False Positives - Lowell  11:56:19 - 12/7/2001  (11705)  (1)
        ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter  12:32:14 - 12/7/2001  (11709)  (1)
           ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org  17:24:01 - 12/7/2001  (11728)  (2)
              ● Re: False Positives - Canie  19:53:51 - 12/7/2001  (11736)  (1)
                 ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org  23:16:56 - 12/7/2001  (11740)  (0)
              ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter  17:50:22 - 12/7/2001  (11734)  (0)