|
Re: False Positives |
Now I am really lost....You said: But the number of EQ's which happen without a prediction are in the dozens or more...How can you determine which is which? And shouldn't "false alarm" just be called a miss? And who determines which quake meets a significant set of matching parameters? Is it like consensus??? Follow Ups: ● Re: False Positives - Lowell 11:56:19 - 12/7/2001 (11705) (1) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 12:32:14 - 12/7/2001 (11709) (1) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 17:24:01 - 12/7/2001 (11728) (2) ● Re: False Positives - Canie 19:53:51 - 12/7/2001 (11736) (1) ● Re: False Positives - bobshannon.org 23:16:56 - 12/7/2001 (11740) (0) ● Re: False Positives - Roger Hunter 17:50:22 - 12/7/2001 (11734) (0) |
|