Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection
Posted by mark on July 08, 2001 at 00:13:17:

Folks:

More seemingly coincidental things going on....

Near Real Time Earthquake List
Updated as of Sun Jul 8 02:19:46 GMT 2001. DATE-(UTC)-TIME Latitude Longitude Depth Magnitude Q COMMENTS
yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss degrees degrees km
2001/07/07 20:45:41 36.26N 89.39W 5.0 3.1 A NEW MADRID, MISSOURI REGION
2001/07/07 18:02:53 43.63N 105.21W 0.0 3.5 B POWDER RIVER BASIN BLAST

One might conjecture that the Powder River Basin Blast at 18:02:53 created an energy wave which traversed the "Crack across America" fault line (if you can call it that) searching for a place to "quake".

At 20:45:41, some 2 3/4 hours later, it converged at New Madrid triggering the Mag 3.5.

Now, if so, we have us here "a problem"...==> How did the energy Increase it's energy level in propagating from A to B. If the Mag at Power River Basin was 3.1 then how did it "grow" to Mag 3.5 at New Madrid (setting aside bad measurements).

Actually this situation looks like it would be more plausible if New Madrid happened first and not the other way around...hmmm. I've got it...we'll call this theory the acausal far-field quake triggering theory...the resulting quake happens "before" the causative factor (maybe via a Dark Energy / Dark matter conduit).

What do you think ?

(Yeah...I know...it's late...)

mark



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - Lowell  00:58:53 - 7/8/2001  (8345)  (1)
        ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - Don in Hollister  09:06:10 - 7/8/2001  (8347)  (2)
           ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - Lowell  12:17:20 - 7/8/2001  (8351)  (1)
              ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - michael  16:44:01 - 7/8/2001  (8356)  (0)
           ● Re: Science Experiment - Petra Challus  10:42:55 - 7/8/2001  (8348)  (3)
              ● Playtime - Lowell  12:53:18 - 7/8/2001  (8353)  (1)
                 ● Re: Playtime - Don in Hollister  14:14:12 - 7/8/2001  (8354)  (1)
                    ● 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  14:50:23 - 7/8/2001  (8355)  (1)
                       ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:53:59 - 7/8/2001  (8358)  (4)
                          ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Canie  08:24:27 - 7/9/2001  (8371)  (1)
                             ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  12:50:12 - 7/9/2001  (8380)  (0)
                          ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Roger Hunter  05:21:50 - 7/9/2001  (8369)  (0)
                          ● Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  20:03:28 - 7/8/2001  (8362)  (1)
                             ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  13:06:39 - 7/9/2001  (8381)  (1)
                                ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  14:17:50 - 7/9/2001  (8382)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:06:01 - 7/9/2001  (8384)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  16:46:32 - 7/9/2001  (8386)  (0)
                          ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  18:19:50 - 7/8/2001  (8360)  (2)
                             ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  08:29:47 - 7/9/2001  (8372)  (1)
                                ● Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:53:07 - 7/9/2001  (8391)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:10:44 - 7/10/2001  (8436)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:57:20 - 7/10/2001  (8437)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  21:46:06 - 7/10/2001  (8440)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  07:58:53 - 7/11/2001  (8445)  (1)
                                               ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  19:07:28 - 7/12/2001  (8476)  (0)
                             ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  20:12:18 - 7/8/2001  (8363)  (2)
                                ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  00:57:05 - 7/9/2001  (8368)  (0)
                                ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  21:00:39 - 7/8/2001  (8364)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  23:29:44 - 7/8/2001  (8366)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  00:01:26 - 7/9/2001  (8367)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:27:53 - 7/9/2001  (8389)  (0)
              ● Re: Science Experiment - Lowell  12:41:06 - 7/8/2001  (8352)  (0)
              ● Re: Science Experiment - Canie  11:22:06 - 7/8/2001  (8349)  (2)
                 ● Re: Science Experiment - Roger Hunter  21:37:39 - 7/9/2001  (8411)  (0)
                 ● Re: Science Experiment - Beth  23:14:52 - 7/8/2001  (8365)  (0)