|
Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection |
Hi Lowell. After you and I had talked about this I began thinking about the ripple affect we talked about after seeing the same identical change in tensor strain with the data from the Bay Area down to the Southern Calif. area. I have been watching for it to occur again, but to the best of my knowledge I have never seen it again. It has been found that just before most large quakes there is a change in the magnetic field surrounding the epicenter of the quake. However this has not been detected much beyond a 20-mile radius of the epicenter. It may be this magnetic change that is triggering other faults although for the life of me I don’t see how. I know from past experience using the strain data for San Juan Bautista I will see the gradual increase dilational strain and then a complete and sudden total drop in dilational strain hours before the quake. It may be this sudden relaxing of the strain that triggers quakes at other locations. I think I will leave this to the geophysicists to solve. Thinking like this gives me a headache. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - Lowell 12:17:20 - 7/8/2001 (8351) (1) ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - michael 16:44:01 - 7/8/2001 (8356) (0) ● Re: Science Experiment - Petra Challus 10:42:55 - 7/8/2001 (8348) (3) ● Playtime - Lowell 12:53:18 - 7/8/2001 (8353) (1) ● Re: Playtime - Don in Hollister 14:14:12 - 7/8/2001 (8354) (1) ● 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark 14:50:23 - 7/8/2001 (8355) (1) ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell 16:53:59 - 7/8/2001 (8358) (4) ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Canie 08:24:27 - 7/9/2001 (8371) (1) ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell 12:50:12 - 7/9/2001 (8380) (0) ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Roger Hunter 05:21:50 - 7/9/2001 (8369) (0) ● Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark 20:03:28 - 7/8/2001 (8362) (1) ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell 13:06:39 - 7/9/2001 (8381) (1) ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister 14:17:50 - 7/9/2001 (8382) (1) ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell 16:06:01 - 7/9/2001 (8384) (1) ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister 16:46:32 - 7/9/2001 (8386) (0) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus 18:19:50 - 7/8/2001 (8360) (2) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie 08:29:47 - 7/9/2001 (8372) (1) ● Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 18:53:07 - 7/9/2001 (8391) (1) ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie 16:10:44 - 7/10/2001 (8436) (1) ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie 16:57:20 - 7/10/2001 (8437) (1) ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 21:46:06 - 7/10/2001 (8440) (1) ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie 07:58:53 - 7/11/2001 (8445) (1) ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 19:07:28 - 7/12/2001 (8476) (0) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 20:12:18 - 7/8/2001 (8363) (2) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus 00:57:05 - 7/9/2001 (8368) (0) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister 21:00:39 - 7/8/2001 (8364) (1) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 23:29:44 - 7/8/2001 (8366) (1) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister 00:01:26 - 7/9/2001 (8367) (1) ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark 18:27:53 - 7/9/2001 (8389) (0) ● Re: Science Experiment - Lowell 12:41:06 - 7/8/2001 (8352) (0) ● Re: Science Experiment - Canie 11:22:06 - 7/8/2001 (8349) (2) ● Re: Science Experiment - Roger Hunter 21:37:39 - 7/9/2001 (8411) (0) ● Re: Science Experiment - Beth 23:14:52 - 7/8/2001 (8365) (0) |
|