Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection
Posted by Don in Hollister on July 08, 2001 at 09:06:10:

Hi Lowell. After you and I had talked about this I began thinking about the ripple affect we talked about after seeing the same identical change in tensor strain with the data from the Bay Area down to the Southern Calif. area. I have been watching for it to occur again, but to the best of my knowledge I have never seen it again.

It has been found that just before most large quakes there is a change in the magnetic field surrounding the epicenter of the quake. However this has not been detected much beyond a 20-mile radius of the epicenter. It may be this magnetic change that is triggering other faults although for the life of me I don’t see how.

I know from past experience using the strain data for San Juan Bautista I will see the gradual increase dilational strain and then a complete and sudden total drop in dilational strain hours before the quake. It may be this sudden relaxing of the strain that triggers quakes at other locations.

I think I will leave this to the geophysicists to solve. Thinking like this gives me a headache. Take Care…Don in creepy town


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - Lowell  12:17:20 - 7/8/2001  (8351)  (1)
        ● Re: Crack across US, New Madrid, Powder River Blast Connection - michael  16:44:01 - 7/8/2001  (8356)  (0)
     ● Re: Science Experiment - Petra Challus  10:42:55 - 7/8/2001  (8348)  (3)
        ● Playtime - Lowell  12:53:18 - 7/8/2001  (8353)  (1)
           ● Re: Playtime - Don in Hollister  14:14:12 - 7/8/2001  (8354)  (1)
              ● 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  14:50:23 - 7/8/2001  (8355)  (1)
                 ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:53:59 - 7/8/2001  (8358)  (4)
                    ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Canie  08:24:27 - 7/9/2001  (8371)  (1)
                       ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  12:50:12 - 7/9/2001  (8380)  (0)
                    ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Roger Hunter  05:21:50 - 7/9/2001  (8369)  (0)
                    ● Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  20:03:28 - 7/8/2001  (8362)  (1)
                       ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  13:06:39 - 7/9/2001  (8381)  (1)
                          ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  14:17:50 - 7/9/2001  (8382)  (1)
                             ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:06:01 - 7/9/2001  (8384)  (1)
                                ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  16:46:32 - 7/9/2001  (8386)  (0)
                    ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  18:19:50 - 7/8/2001  (8360)  (2)
                       ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  08:29:47 - 7/9/2001  (8372)  (1)
                          ● Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:53:07 - 7/9/2001  (8391)  (1)
                             ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:10:44 - 7/10/2001  (8436)  (1)
                                ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:57:20 - 7/10/2001  (8437)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  21:46:06 - 7/10/2001  (8440)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  07:58:53 - 7/11/2001  (8445)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  19:07:28 - 7/12/2001  (8476)  (0)
                       ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  20:12:18 - 7/8/2001  (8363)  (2)
                          ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  00:57:05 - 7/9/2001  (8368)  (0)
                          ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  21:00:39 - 7/8/2001  (8364)  (1)
                             ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  23:29:44 - 7/8/2001  (8366)  (1)
                                ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  00:01:26 - 7/9/2001  (8367)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:27:53 - 7/9/2001  (8389)  (0)
        ● Re: Science Experiment - Lowell  12:41:06 - 7/8/2001  (8352)  (0)
        ● Re: Science Experiment - Canie  11:22:06 - 7/8/2001  (8349)  (2)
           ● Re: Science Experiment - Roger Hunter  21:37:39 - 7/9/2001  (8411)  (0)
           ● Re: Science Experiment - Beth  23:14:52 - 7/8/2001  (8365)  (0)