|
|
|
|
| Re: big aftershocks |
This quake fits Amit's predicted date using a 3 day window. But he does not predict location and his magnitude was wrong. If you make enough predictions, some of them will be correct. It's just chance. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 10:27:33 - 5/9/2010 (77007) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 10:46:11 - 5/9/2010 (77008) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 06:03:42 - 5/11/2010 (77011) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 08:32:03 - 5/11/2010 (77012) (2) ● 99% level - heartland chris 07:01:10 - 5/13/2010 (77025) (2) ● Re: 99% level - Amit Dave 01:33:20 - 5/14/2010 (77033) (1) ● Re: 99% level - Roger Hunter 07:07:21 - 5/14/2010 (77036) (1) ● Re: 99% level - heartland chris 14:13:10 - 5/15/2010 (77045) (0) ● Re: 99% level - Roger Hunter 07:23:28 - 5/13/2010 (77026) (0) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 11:12:46 - 5/11/2010 (77013) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 11:57:02 - 5/11/2010 (77014) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 12:21:16 - 5/11/2010 (77015) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 03:27:59 - 5/12/2010 (77016) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 08:03:06 - 5/12/2010 (77017) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 10:24:06 - 5/12/2010 (77018) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 11:13:09 - 5/12/2010 (77019) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 11:21:27 - 5/12/2010 (77020) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 23:58:10 - 5/12/2010 (77023) (2) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 07:29:52 - 5/13/2010 (77027) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 00:05:05 - 5/14/2010 (77030) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 07:04:36 - 5/14/2010 (77035) (0) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 02:02:04 - 5/13/2010 (77024) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 07:32:13 - 5/13/2010 (77028) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave 00:18:06 - 5/14/2010 (77031) (1) ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter 07:12:56 - 5/14/2010 (77037) (0) |
|
|
|
|
