Re: What Dennis did
Posted by michael on April 26, 2001 at 08:35:29:

Morning Roger and Bill:

Thats where I run into problems with Dennis. I do not deny that he may be onto something. I keep an open mind and remain hopeful. The problem I have is with the comments that he has significant results.

Nobody has been able to point to any body of data to back that up, so I can't yet buy into that statement. I'd like to, but there simply is not data to support it. The primary goal of the Registry initiative is to create a body of data that predictors can point to.

I assume that when someone says Dennis is significant, it's just a gut feeling, open to interpretation. I would really like to see most if not all the subjectivity eliminated from this subject.

Michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: What Dennis did - Canie  09:00:18 - 4/26/2001  (7122)  (1)
        ● Re: What Dennis did - michael  10:11:15 - 4/26/2001  (7123)  (2)
           ● Not so Sure - bobshannon.org  05:31:21 - 4/28/2001  (7170)  (0)
           ● Re: What Dennis did - Bill in OR  19:06:07 - 4/26/2001  (7135)  (3)
              ● Example - bobshannon.org  05:47:58 - 4/28/2001  (7171)  (0)
              ● Re: What Dennis did - michael  09:03:36 - 4/27/2001  (7144)  (0)
              ● Re: Dennis's track record - Roger Musson  03:13:29 - 4/27/2001  (7141)  (0)