|
Re: What Dennis did |
Morning Roger and Bill: Thats where I run into problems with Dennis. I do not deny that he may be onto something. I keep an open mind and remain hopeful. The problem I have is with the comments that he has significant results. Nobody has been able to point to any body of data to back that up, so I can't yet buy into that statement. I'd like to, but there simply is not data to support it. The primary goal of the Registry initiative is to create a body of data that predictors can point to. I assume that when someone says Dennis is significant, it's just a gut feeling, open to interpretation. I would really like to see most if not all the subjectivity eliminated from this subject. Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: What Dennis did - Canie 09:00:18 - 4/26/2001 (7122) (1) ● Re: What Dennis did - michael 10:11:15 - 4/26/2001 (7123) (2) ● Not so Sure - bobshannon.org 05:31:21 - 4/28/2001 (7170) (0) ● Re: What Dennis did - Bill in OR 19:06:07 - 4/26/2001 (7135) (3) ● Example - bobshannon.org 05:47:58 - 4/28/2001 (7171) (0) ● Re: What Dennis did - michael 09:03:36 - 4/27/2001 (7144) (0) ● Re: Dennis's track record - Roger Musson 03:13:29 - 4/27/2001 (7141) (0) |
|