|
Analysis of Post 4297 |
Forcast by Martin is for a 3+ within 48 hours of his post within 15 miles of Pinnacles NM, CA. Latitude/Longitude was centered on the center of Pinnacles NM, CA. This is my first crack at an analysis, so any comments and suggestions, as always, are welcome. Lat: -121.128 I looked at the NEIC catalog for a 25 year period from 1975 through 2000. There were 4 earthquakes that fit these parameters. Based on that information, I deduced that there is about a 1 in 1141 chance of a hit by random chance. This translates to a .087% chance of occurance. A hit with this prediction would be very impressive indeed! Thoughts? Follow Ups: ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Roger Hunter 16:14:17 - 1/3/2001 (4360) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Michael 16:25:51 - 1/3/2001 (4361) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Roger Hunter 16:56:09 - 1/3/2001 (4363) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Michael 17:19:59 - 1/3/2001 (4364) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Roger Hunter 17:44:21 - 1/3/2001 (4365) (1) ● As a reminder Alan offered to do evaluations - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 20:01:44 - 1/3/2001 (4369) (1) ● Alan - Michael 23:13:52 - 1/3/2001 (4374) (1) ● Re: Alan - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 10:19:10 - 1/4/2001 (4378) (1) ● Question Dennis? - Bob Shannon 06:43:57 - 1/5/2001 (4389) (1) ● Re: Question Dennis? - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 10:02:43 - 1/5/2001 (4390) (0) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Don in Hollister 14:56:52 - 1/3/2001 (4352) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Michael 15:25:40 - 1/3/2001 (4355) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Don in Hollister 16:13:56 - 1/3/2001 (4359) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Michael 16:39:03 - 1/3/2001 (4362) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - - Petra Challus 17:45:56 - 1/3/2001 (4366) (1) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - - Roger Hunter 18:23:39 - 1/3/2001 (4367) (0) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297, thanks...mb. - martin 13:35:19 - 1/3/2001 (4342) (1) ● Santa Cruz - Michael 13:49:51 - 1/3/2001 (4346) (0) ● Sorry, typo on window - Michael 12:12:19 - 1/3/2001 (4341) (0) ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 Correction - Michael 12:09:33 - 1/3/2001 (4340) (0) |
|