|
Re: Alaska quake swarm |
Hello Jane, Yes, the depths are very interesting. This is not like a 15 Km strike slip with an aftershock sequence. The depths of these quakes are throughout the subduction process. The whole thing is moving at once, so it seems. The big question is if it is straining out, or will it cut loose a locked portion and go big. Right now my gut feeling is 60/40 that it goes bigger. Lots of help I am, ya? Glen
Follow Ups: ● Re: Alaska quake swarm - Cathryn 13:49:31 - 7/9/2006 (39230) (1) ● 1964 - chris in suburbia 15:42:27 - 7/9/2006 (39234) (2) ● Re: 1964 - Cathryn 16:50:24 - 7/9/2006 (39237) (0) ● Re: 1964 - Glen 16:07:34 - 7/9/2006 (39236) (2) ● Re: 1964 - chris in suburbia 06:24:30 - 7/10/2006 (39248) (1) ● Re: 1964 - Canie 11:20:54 - 7/10/2006 (39254) (1) ● Re: 1964 - Glen 13:00:42 - 7/10/2006 (39259) (1) ● gaps, 1946 - chris in suburbia 14:58:00 - 7/10/2006 (39262) (2) ● Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen 22:17:21 - 7/11/2006 (39270) (2) ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane 03:53:27 - 7/12/2006 (39279) (2) ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen 13:03:47 - 7/12/2006 (39294) (0) ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn 06:26:30 - 7/12/2006 (39285) (1) ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane 17:54:33 - 7/12/2006 (39297) (0) ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn 02:08:11 - 7/12/2006 (39276) (0) ● The past is the past - Cathryn 01:52:52 - 7/11/2006 (39264) (0) ● Re: 1964 - Cathryn 17:10:58 - 7/9/2006 (39238) (0) |
|