Re: 1964
Posted by Canie on July 10, 2006 at 11:20:54:

I was wondering myself if something big was coming into the works there - I didn't even know about the 9.1 mentioned in 1957.. A look at NEIC history has it recalculated at an 8.6.. but clearly, the entire area is capable of some rather large quakes...

Canie

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 1964 - Glen  13:00:42 - 7/10/2006  (39259)  (1)
        ● gaps, 1946 - chris in suburbia  14:58:00 - 7/10/2006  (39262)  (2)
           ● Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen  22:17:21 - 7/11/2006  (39270)  (2)
              ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane  03:53:27 - 7/12/2006  (39279)  (2)
                 ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen  13:03:47 - 7/12/2006  (39294)  (0)
                 ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn  06:26:30 - 7/12/2006  (39285)  (1)
                    ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane  17:54:33 - 7/12/2006  (39297)  (0)
              ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn  02:08:11 - 7/12/2006  (39276)  (0)
           ● The past is the past - Cathryn  01:52:52 - 7/11/2006  (39264)  (0)