Re: 1964
Posted by Glen on July 09, 2006 at 16:07:34:

Howdy,

The site I have linked puts the depth at about 25 Km. There are some good photos with this. Clearly, as Chris says, there was a good deal of activity well beyond the epicenter. Looks like other faults were activated also.

Glen

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 1964 - chris in suburbia  06:24:30 - 7/10/2006  (39248)  (1)
        ● Re: 1964 - Canie  11:20:54 - 7/10/2006  (39254)  (1)
           ● Re: 1964 - Glen  13:00:42 - 7/10/2006  (39259)  (1)
              ● gaps, 1946 - chris in suburbia  14:58:00 - 7/10/2006  (39262)  (2)
                 ● Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen  22:17:21 - 7/11/2006  (39270)  (2)
                    ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane  03:53:27 - 7/12/2006  (39279)  (2)
                       ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Glen  13:03:47 - 7/12/2006  (39294)  (0)
                       ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn  06:26:30 - 7/12/2006  (39285)  (1)
                          ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Jane  17:54:33 - 7/12/2006  (39297)  (0)
                    ● Re: Scotch Cap, Unimak - Cathryn  02:08:11 - 7/12/2006  (39276)  (0)
                 ● The past is the past - Cathryn  01:52:52 - 7/11/2006  (39264)  (0)
     ● Re: 1964 - Cathryn  17:10:58 - 7/9/2006  (39238)  (0)