|
Re: California quiet - Don or Roger |
Don or Roger, If time permits, please run some catalogs for CA as follows so we can see how much earthquake activity has increased. I think it might prove revealing for everyone....Petra Please don't post the catalogs themselves, but provide the numbers. 2003: 3's, 4's, 5's, 6's. * I think the 7.+ quake off of the North Coast can be omitted because it's so far out there, it might as well be in it's own country. Thank You. Follow Ups: ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Roger Hunter 13:26:54 - 12/13/2005 (31955) (2) ● 5.0 quakes in 2005 - Barbara 19:57:56 - 12/13/2005 (31960) (1) ● Re: 5.0 quakes in 2005 - Roger Hunter 21:54:49 - 12/13/2005 (31965) (0) ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Barbara 17:52:17 - 12/13/2005 (31957) (1) ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Roger Hunter 21:51:53 - 12/13/2005 (31962) (1) ● includes aftershocks - chris in suburbia 03:22:53 - 12/14/2005 (31967) (1) ● Re: includes aftershocks - Roger Hunter 09:37:12 - 12/14/2005 (31968) (1) ● Re: includes aftershocks 2003/2004 too - Petra 20:13:12 - 12/14/2005 (32000) (0) ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - chris in suburbia 10:50:08 - 12/13/2005 (31929) (1) ● Boron 3.7...foreshock? - chris in suburbia 13:16:59 - 12/13/2005 (31954) (1) ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Don in Hollister 15:08:23 - 12/13/2005 (31956) (1) ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Canie 19:14:52 - 12/13/2005 (31958) (1) ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Byron 15:48:32 - 12/14/2005 (31998) (1) ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Byron 15:51:50 - 12/14/2005 (31999) (1) ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - chris in suburbia 05:12:36 - 12/15/2005 (32003) (0) |
|