Canie

I understand your approach and I would like to explain the following:

Generally there is no correct explanation for the specific period in which the
aftershocks will occur after a strong quake. But in this case the short period, I am
inline with your concept. But whenever I received a strong signal whether the strong quake
occurred before in the same location or not, I will informed accordingly. Here I would
like to mention that after 9.3M I have given the 8.3M prediction after 3 months.
Probably you may call it as after shock of 9.3M but for me it is a fresh quake based
on fresh precursor.

Suppose if the precursor activated the Xijang fault it is to be added into my precursor
analysis and added experience into my new concept.

In this particular case I have limited the range into 220 KMs since I am confident
about the location based on the pattern of precursor registered.

So far my knowledge nobody has given their method for their prediction proved as success.
Since the 'experts' felt that my predictions are meaningless, I don't want to disclose my
secret which is again become meaningless.

Shan