Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on November 20, 2005 at 14:46:56:
Hi Glen, Thank for your comments and here is my explanation. Actually, it was a lesson for me to stick on to my own principle and not to listen others after the 8.3M March 05 prediction. Usually I am taking readings on a plain wall for the whole year (some times it exceeds to the next year on the same wall). While doing so, it is good as well as bad to derive the prediction since it is making confusion if we move on the previous year track but at the same time we can get some clues like whether we are stick on the same track or not etc. Also some days due to lack of infrastructural facility at my home I constrained to take readings on the same wall in a different location subject to available sunshine on a particular period. So if you see the tracks on a later days it is difficult to identify properly unless put some hint on the tracks. Actually March 21st when the actual readings were taken was the intersecting period on the track; interestingly having the same day but couple of months back. Initially I have announced the 8.3M quake based on my readings which I have took correct. Later I have received the expert's opinion that never such quake occurs in the short period, as I reported in the board earlier. After seeing such statements I went to analysis the track and I took the reference of the intersecting day date of old month as new one and based on that I revised it as around 5M after getting confused. Accordingly I posted in this board also. But after seeing the result, I got a good lesson that be on my own stand and never listen to others experience and also strongly felt that to make a pucca track with proper identity of days during such intersecting periods. Though it was real pain at that time, I do not want to hurt the experts by narrating my experience, in the Board. But I thank God for gave me 2 such opportunities (9.3 and 8.3M) to register the earth movements which are rare events before great quakes. Please note that I suspect the change in magnitude of the incoming Honshu quake between 7 to 8M instead of 6 to 7M as reported earlier in the board and in my site (now reported ACCORDINGLY), based on the earth movement. Hope this CHANGE is acceptable for normal people who understand better. But I cannot do anything for other's baseless arguments since I have no time. Shan
Follow Ups:
● You Change Walls? - glen 17:42:01 - 11/20/2005 (30816) (2)
● Re: You Change Walls? - R.Shanmugasundaram 01:53:31 - 11/21/2005 (30836) (2)
● Appreciated, Shan - glen 10:32:30 - 11/21/2005 (30862) (0)
● Super Secret Sun Shadow Franchise - Ara 07:50:46 - 11/21/2005 (30841) (1)
● Ara, That was Uncalled for... - glen 10:36:51 - 11/21/2005 (30863) (1)
● Very very called for - Ara 21:01:30 - 11/21/2005 (30890) (1)
● Re: Very very called for - glen 00:46:41 - 11/22/2005 (30895) (0)
● Yet Another Revised Shan Prediction - Ara 20:31:58 - 11/20/2005 (30820) (0)
● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - Don in Hollister 15:19:11 - 11/20/2005 (30815) (1)
● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - R.Shanmugasundaram 01:40:56 - 11/21/2005 (30833) (0)
|