Good Morning,

I will give Shan the chance to explain further. I am interested in his methodology. I can't track every prediction he makes, but he has hits. Also he predicts in areas not frequented by the "dizzy" crowd; a batch of people who utilize parasitic prediction based on sympathetic, illogical, worn out, time tested methods which are applauded on some forums. Kind of like EQM on steroids or a bowl of hashish.

At some point, the fault zone geology and the reasoning for a prediction must meld. Beyond that, it becomes a game of "follow the leader". I will give Shan credit for standing alone, and trying to bridge the language differences.

glen