Shan's so-called 8M Prediction
Posted by Ara on November 19, 2005 at 20:30:08:

Shan: "Here I would like to mention that after 9.3M I have given the 8.3M prediction after 3 months."

Here I would like to mention that Shan CHANGED that prediction from 8M to 5M before the quake occurred. At the time, to his credit, John Vidale was the only one who emphasized that.

So at the time of the quake, Shan's prediction was for a 5M quake. If you consider his earlier, cancelled prediction still active, then he made two predictions, not one.

I've carefully watched his website for over a year. He allows himself the freedom to change predictions, and as his current post demonstrates, he will select whichever of the predictions (cancelled or not) can be consider hits.

This is self-promotion. Or as Glen called it "coagulated parasitism" with chamelon characteristics.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Shan's so-called 8M Prediction - glen  23:21:37 - 11/19/2005  (30756)  (1)
        ● Shan's 8M Prediction - R.Shanmugasundaram  14:46:56 - 11/20/2005  (30814)  (2)
           ● You Change Walls? - glen  17:42:01 - 11/20/2005  (30816)  (2)
              ● Re: You Change Walls? - R.Shanmugasundaram  01:53:31 - 11/21/2005  (30836)  (2)
                 ● Appreciated, Shan - glen  10:32:30 - 11/21/2005  (30862)  (0)
                 ● Super Secret Sun Shadow Franchise - Ara  07:50:46 - 11/21/2005  (30841)  (1)
                    ● Ara, That was Uncalled for... - glen  10:36:51 - 11/21/2005  (30863)  (1)
                       ● Very very called for  - Ara  21:01:30 - 11/21/2005  (30890)  (1)
                          ● Re: Very very called for  - glen  00:46:41 - 11/22/2005  (30895)  (0)
              ● Yet Another Revised Shan Prediction - Ara  20:31:58 - 11/20/2005  (30820)  (0)
           ● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - Don in Hollister  15:19:11 - 11/20/2005  (30815)  (1)
              ● Re: Shan's 8M Prediction - R.Shanmugasundaram  01:40:56 - 11/21/2005  (30833)  (0)