|
Re: EQ Prediction Registry |
Hi Roger, Yeah, I understand the obstacles you are currently dealing with, and you're right, there is a lot of bs out there with people that don't want to be pinned down. On the other hand, there are some interesting ideas that should be looked at. So, to cut to the chase, what constitutes a valid eq prediction in the scientific community? What exactly are the specifics? timespan, geographical area, and magnitude range? Is that it? Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 12:27:00 - 11/8/2005 (30184) (2) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 21:00:32 - 11/8/2005 (30200) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 21:17:01 - 11/8/2005 (30203) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 21:23:20 - 11/8/2005 (30205) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 22:02:46 - 11/8/2005 (30208) (2) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 00:42:20 - 11/9/2005 (30212) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 06:40:50 - 11/9/2005 (30217) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 10:46:49 - 11/9/2005 (30219) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 00:28:33 - 11/9/2005 (30210) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 12:57:05 - 11/8/2005 (30187) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 13:00:15 - 11/8/2005 (30188) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 20:45:04 - 11/8/2005 (30198) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 21:22:59 - 11/8/2005 (30204) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 21:28:11 - 11/8/2005 (30206) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 21:50:06 - 11/8/2005 (30207) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 00:30:57 - 11/9/2005 (30211) (0) |
|