|
Re: EQ Prediction Registry |
Roger, Just reread your comments about probability. I would think that would stray into the realm of interpretation, and should not be included. It would be up to statistics experts, such as yourself, to include that in your evaluation, in my opinion.... If it is something that would likely be debated, such as probability, it probably (no pun intented) has no place in a registry.... Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 21:17:01 - 11/8/2005 (30203) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 21:23:20 - 11/8/2005 (30205) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 22:02:46 - 11/8/2005 (30208) (2) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 00:42:20 - 11/9/2005 (30212) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 06:40:50 - 11/9/2005 (30217) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 10:46:49 - 11/9/2005 (30219) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 00:28:33 - 11/9/2005 (30210) (0) |
|