Re: EQ Prediction Registry
Posted by Michael Tolchard on November 08, 2005 at 21:00:32:

Roger,

Just reread your comments about probability.

I would think that would stray into the realm of interpretation, and should not be included. It would be up to statistics experts, such as yourself, to include that in your evaluation, in my opinion....

If it is something that would likely be debated, such as probability, it probably (no pun intented) has no place in a registry....

Michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  21:17:01 - 11/8/2005  (30203)  (1)
        ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  21:23:20 - 11/8/2005  (30205)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  22:02:46 - 11/8/2005  (30208)  (2)
              ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  00:42:20 - 11/9/2005  (30212)  (1)
                 ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  06:40:50 - 11/9/2005  (30217)  (1)
                    ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  10:46:49 - 11/9/2005  (30219)  (0)
              ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  00:28:33 - 11/9/2005  (30210)  (0)