|
Re: EQ Prediction Registry |
Yeah, postdictions are not predictions, so obviously timestamps would be checked. Maybe somebody else can build a postdiction registry?? ha ha ha Aftershock considerations are not the problem for the registry to figure out. I think taking them into consideration would be during the analysis phase, in whatever manner any givin analyst chooses, and once again, all that is open to interpretation, you know, when is an aftershock no longer an aftershock, maybe it turns into a foreshock in retrospect, or even a main shock, blah blah blah so on and so forth .... Not the place of a registry to make assumptions or interpretations or limit the predictor IMHO ... - Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 06:40:50 - 11/9/2005 (30217) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 10:46:49 - 11/9/2005 (30219) (0) |
|