|
|
|
Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion
|
Posted by Lowell on October 22, 2001 at 19:32:54:
A second strong CME hit the earth today at about 17:10-17:12 UT. This occurred while Texas was directly sub-solar (local noon). An interesting test for the hypothesis that the seismograms are recording actual ground motion associated with the collision of the earth system with a CME (Coronal Mass Emission) from the sun is to look at the Hockley, Texas seismogram at the moment of collision since it was directly sub-solar at the time and would show the maximum ground motion (if any occurs). Theoretically, the compression of the ionosphere and troposphere on the side facing the sun (the sub-solar point) will lead to a depression in the earth below and the first motion observed on the seismogram should be down. Looking at yesterday's seismograms it does appear that those located on the side of the earth facing the sun at the time of the storm commencement (College, Alaska, Spitzbergen) do show first motion which is down, while those facing away from the incoming CME show first motion which is up (New Zealand, Siberia, Mongolia). So it should be possible to answer Roger's question regarding ground motion vs induced electrical currents in the same way we determine focal mechanisms of earthquakes - by examination of first motion on the seismograms. BW also asked a question regarding what free oscillations of the earth are. Think of it this way, BW. When you hit a drumhead with a drumstick, you create vibrations at the point of impact, these sounds spread across the drum membrane and are equivalent to seismic waves emanating from a single source. But longer wavelength waves are also produced because the drumhead is tied down at the ends, the vibrations bounce off the edges and set up standing waves whose wavelengths are related to the size and shape of the drumhead. These standing waves are more like free-earth oscillations. In Free-earth oscillations, the earth vibrates as a whole. The wavelengths are much longer than those of seismic waves which are generally about the length of the fault that produced them (or shorter). Many people people think of this as similar to the ringing of a bell, the larger the bell, the deeper the tones. In this case, the earth is one huge bell with extremely deep (inaudible) tones. But also consider that a bell can be caused to vibrate by a strong wind passing by it or by striking it with a hammer - I hope you get the drift. Back to the main topic. The CME arrived today about 17:11 while Hockley Texas was sub-solar. To see the effect on apparent ground motion look at the USGS on-line seismometer for IU/HKT and come to your own conclusions. Seismometer readings for the day at: http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.htm Minute-by-minute GOES geomagnetic field data at: http://sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/lists/geomag/20011022_G8mag_1m.txt
Follow Ups:
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Roger Hunter 20:16:18 - 10/22/2001 (10232) (1)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Lowell 23:19:20 - 10/22/2001 (10236) (1)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Lowell 23:32:25 - 10/22/2001 (10237) (2)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Roger Hunter 05:27:16 - 10/23/2001 (10241) (1)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Lowell 08:05:26 - 10/23/2001 (10243) (1)
● Art Bell - Roger Hunter 10:51:22 - 10/23/2001 (10247) (0)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Billion Watts 04:51:20 - 10/23/2001 (10240) (1)
● Re: Effects from the latest CME arrival on ground motion - Lowell 08:17:59 - 10/23/2001 (10245) (0)
|
|
|