|
Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years |
Correction; I evaluated his methods, not his predictions. He has several ideas we are testing, none of which have passed the test. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Amit 13:08:56 - 8/3/2013 (100743) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 18:10:00 - 8/3/2013 (100744) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 19:02:26 - 8/3/2013 (100745) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Amit 21:03:40 - 8/4/2013 (100748) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 23:13:41 - 8/4/2013 (100749) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise 02:01:32 - 8/5/2013 (100751) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 09:23:22 - 8/5/2013 (100754) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise 16:56:21 - 8/5/2013 (100755) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 19:02:27 - 8/5/2013 (100756) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise 19:18:26 - 8/5/2013 (100757) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 20:00:59 - 8/5/2013 (100758) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Jim W. 01:17:52 - 8/21/2013 (100779) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise 20:39:35 - 8/21/2013 (100782) (0) |
|