Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 03, 2013 at 19:02:26:

Amit;

Late breaking news...

Your high score was the result of a very obscure programming error which caused hits to be counted twice.

The true score is in fact below chance.

Sorry to disappoint you.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Amit  21:03:40 - 8/4/2013  (100748)  (1)
        ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter  23:13:41 - 8/4/2013  (100749)  (1)
           ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise  02:01:32 - 8/5/2013  (100751)  (1)
              ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter  09:23:22 - 8/5/2013  (100754)  (1)
                 ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise  16:56:21 - 8/5/2013  (100755)  (1)
                    ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter  19:02:27 - 8/5/2013  (100756)  (1)
                       ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise  19:18:26 - 8/5/2013  (100757)  (1)
                          ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter  20:00:59 - 8/5/2013  (100758)  (1)
                             ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Jim W.  01:17:52 - 8/21/2013  (100779)  (1)
                                ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise  20:39:35 - 8/21/2013  (100782)  (0)