|
Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years |
That would sure take the term "high level language" to a whole new level, wouldn't it? The compiler for 'real language' programming would have to be pretty smart to understand the ambiguities of normal speech. English is a tough one at that. We humans have a lot of trouble understand each other as it is and we're a whole lot 'smarter' than any computer. Any time you move away from machine code you start introducing compromises. But, I think it all depends on the application and context. I have to admit it would be awesome to have Star Trek style verbal interactivity with a computer for certain applications. We're getting there a bit with things like Siri on the iPhone. But even there, the computer still doesn't truly understand us. It's still just a huge pile of "if...then" algorithms. Neural networks on the other hand.... Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Roger Hunter 20:00:59 - 8/5/2013 (100758) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Jim W. 01:17:52 - 8/21/2013 (100779) (1) ● Re: Rogers evaluation for last 10 years - Skywise 20:39:35 - 8/21/2013 (100782) (0) |
|