Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012
Posted by EQF on December 07, 2012 at 12:29:15:

Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7,2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5

This is now probably be one of the highest accuracy and most timely earthquake forecasts in my collection.

2012/12/07 08:48:15 37.85N 143.58E 35 5.5 209km ESE of Ishinomaki, Japan
2012/12/07 08:31:14 37.94N 143.76E 29 6.2 218km SE of Ofunato, Japan
2012/12/07 08:18:24 37.89N 144.09E 36 7.3 245km SE of Kamaishi, Japan
NEIS Data

On December 5, 2012 a formal Earthquake Advisory for the Japan area was sent to Japan government offices and Japan researchers and quite a few other earthquake researchers around the world including several EarthWaves board posters. It advised them to check their data to see if they could spot anything significant approaching for the Japan area.

I thought that one like that might be as low as 5.5 for an earthquake close to the surface and perhaps 7.5 if deep in the crust. And those were pretty deep.

Some of that information was contained in the following EarthWaves post. However, in that post I did not state that the advisory was for Japan as I did in my E-mail advisory. Instead, using a more cautious approach to keep people in that area from getting upset I pointed to Western Pacific Ocean areas.

http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/80688.html

The following chart showd a sharp line peak group around 140 E. And other EM Signals also indicated that it might be a Japan area earthquake.

Many, many Japan government officials and researchers were warned plus the EarthWaves board visitors. And Japan officials can’t say that someone didn’t tell them that one was on the way.

These are personal opinions.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Shan  22:58:04 - 12/8/2012  (80744)  (1)
        ● Some Comments – December 9, 2012 - EQF  09:06:27 - 12/9/2012  (80746)  (2)
           ● Thanks...where is the next..? - Shan  09:29:06 - 12/10/2012  (80752)  (1)
              ● Here it is....... - Shan  10:56:30 - 12/10/2012  (80753)  (0)
           ● Re: Some Comments – December 9, 2012 - Roger Hunter  10:02:27 - 12/9/2012  (80747)  (1)
              ● in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - John Vidale  10:19:28 - 12/9/2012  (80748)  (1)
                 ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Roger Hunter  10:46:22 - 12/9/2012  (80749)  (1)
                    ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Island Chris  06:22:48 - 12/10/2012  (80750)  (1)
                       ● Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  00:25:52 - 12/11/2012  (80757)  (2)
                          ● EQF in a nutshell - John Vidale  10:06:17 - 12/11/2012  (80760)  (0)
                          ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Roger Hunter  08:15:11 - 12/11/2012  (80759)  (2)
                             ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Island Chris  06:52:51 - 12/12/2012  (80768)  (1)
                                ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  01:13:05 - 12/13/2012  (80774)  (0)
                             ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  03:39:43 - 12/12/2012  (80766)  (0)
     ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter  14:56:49 - 12/7/2012  (80740)  (1)
        ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - EQF  18:12:13 - 12/7/2012  (80741)  (1)
           ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter  18:31:21 - 12/7/2012  (80742)  (0)
     ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter  14:56:21 - 12/7/2012  (80739)  (0)