Question– December 11, 2012
Posted by EQF on December 11, 2012 at 00:25:52:

Question– December 11, 2012

Chris,

Why do you need to ask Roger or anyone else to obtain information regarding my Earthquake Advisory details? The important information was and at the moment still is available from my forecasting Web site. And it was made available in the following post and others as well.

http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/80738.html

The chart below posted to my forecasting Web page on December 3, 2012 shows a strong line peak around 141 E. And that means that my computer programs identified fault zones along those longitude lines as locations for possible strong seismic activity.

I was able to use some other data to specifically point to the Japan area when I circulated my Earthquake Advisory. But that chart was still my primary data that was included with the advisory.

Regarding people questioning the validity, accuracy, and importance of Earthquake Advisories like that I have to say that at the very least, it is a sad commentary on the world of science that people who should know better are behaving in such a manner.

These are personal opinions.


Follow Ups:
     ● EQF in a nutshell - John Vidale  10:06:17 - 12/11/2012  (80760)  (0)
     ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Roger Hunter  08:15:11 - 12/11/2012  (80759)  (2)
        ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Island Chris  06:52:51 - 12/12/2012  (80768)  (1)
           ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  01:13:05 - 12/13/2012  (80774)  (0)
        ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  03:39:43 - 12/12/2012  (80766)  (0)