Re: those aren't refereed papers
Posted by Pavel Kalenda on August 20, 2012 at 18:23:54:

And what this has to do with the validity of the hypothesis and correct prediction? We observed correctly the anomalous stress waves before EQs and we correctly predicted them. Must it be judged in journals to be true? NOT! The true is independent on the people. It can be tested only by prediction of the reality. If the prediction is correct, than the hypothesis is true. Because 1+1=2 and 2+2=4 independently on the number of journals and their Impact Factor.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: those aren't refereed papers - Skywise  19:56:43 - 8/20/2012  (80151)  (0)
     ● web links, then? - John Vidale  19:54:06 - 8/20/2012  (80150)  (1)
        ● Re: web links, then? - Pavel Kalenda  21:01:06 - 8/20/2012  (80152)  (1)
           ● it's not that hard - John Vidale  22:10:24 - 8/20/2012  (80153)  (1)
              ● Re: it's not that hard - Pavel Kalenda  11:15:31 - 8/21/2012  (80155)  (1)
                 ● email - John Vidale  11:40:47 - 8/21/2012  (80156)  (1)
                    ● got it - John Vidale  22:23:32 - 8/21/2012  (80160)  (1)
                       ● Re: got it - Pavel Kalenda  23:31:19 - 8/21/2012  (80162)  (1)
                          ● that signal is way too big - John Vidale  23:53:44 - 8/21/2012  (80163)  (1)
                             ● Re: that signal is way too big - Pavel Kalenda  00:30:55 - 8/22/2012  (80164)  (1)
                                ● confusing - John Vidale  09:56:57 - 8/22/2012  (80168)  (3)
                                   ● Re: confusing - Pavel Kalenda  02:13:23 - 8/23/2012  (80177)  (1)
                                      ● Re: confusing - Skywise  09:30:01 - 8/23/2012  (80181)  (0)
                                   ● Re: confusing - Pavel Kalenda  13:38:38 - 8/22/2012  (80171)  (1)
                                      ● Berger - John Vidale  15:11:57 - 8/22/2012  (80172)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Berger - Pavel Kalenda  00:29:24 - 8/23/2012  (80176)  (1)
                                            ● move discussion to new thread? - heartland chris  06:33:14 - 8/23/2012  (80179)  (1)
                                               ● no point - John Vidale  09:30:51 - 8/24/2012  (80193)  (0)
                                   ● typo correction - John Vidale  10:01:33 - 8/22/2012  (80169)  (0)