Re: M6s 18 minutes apart: Chris
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 03, 2012 at 16:11:07:

Chris;

This isn't making sense.

I have a list of all mag 6+ quakes. I start with the first quake, check all subsequent quakes, eliminating any that are within 10 days and 1000 km and tallying the moon position for each.

Then I move to the second quake and repeat.

Since there are over 5000 quakes in the file there will be hundreds of thousands of moon positions, most of them duplicates.

Moreover, those near the end will get short counts.

What am I missing? This can't be what you want.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● 29 columns - heartland chris  15:51:31 - 8/4/2012  (80022)  (2)
        ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:51:19 - 8/5/2012  (80031)  (0)
        ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:50:42 - 8/5/2012  (80030)  (1)
           ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:53:48 - 8/5/2012  (80032)  (1)
              ● Re: 29 columns - Island Chris  06:27:37 - 8/6/2012  (80034)  (1)
                 ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  07:02:40 - 8/6/2012  (80035)  (1)
                    ● no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - island chris  05:26:01 - 8/11/2012  (80064)  (1)
                       ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Roger Hunter  07:35:46 - 8/11/2012  (80065)  (1)
                          ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Amit  07:48:35 - 8/12/2012  (80069)  (0)