|
29 columns |
Roger, you will get a list of M6+ quakes that contain few after shocks. Then you plot them again the lunar cycle, full to new. That could be 14 1/2 days (full to new) or 29 days (full to new and back to full. Just plot number of quakes per day for 14 or 29 days. Its just to refute or support the claim above that the two M6+ quakes were related to the full moon that was about that time. It's so simple that it should be a clear result, but of course for those who "believe" otherwise it will not be clear at all. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter 17:51:19 - 8/5/2012 (80031) (0) ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter 17:50:42 - 8/5/2012 (80030) (1) ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter 17:53:48 - 8/5/2012 (80032) (1) ● Re: 29 columns - Island Chris 06:27:37 - 8/6/2012 (80034) (1) ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter 07:02:40 - 8/6/2012 (80035) (1) ● no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - island chris 05:26:01 - 8/11/2012 (80064) (1) ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Roger Hunter 07:35:46 - 8/11/2012 (80065) (1) ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Amit 07:48:35 - 8/12/2012 (80069) (0) |
|