29 columns
Posted by heartland chris on August 04, 2012 at 15:51:31:

Roger, you will get a list of M6+ quakes that contain few after shocks. Then you plot them again the lunar cycle, full to new. That could be 14 1/2 days (full to new) or 29 days (full to new and back to full.

Just plot number of quakes per day for 14 or 29 days.

Its just to refute or support the claim above that the two M6+ quakes were related to the full moon that was about that time.

It's so simple that it should be a clear result, but of course for those who "believe" otherwise it will not be clear at all.

Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:51:19 - 8/5/2012  (80031)  (0)
     ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:50:42 - 8/5/2012  (80030)  (1)
        ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  17:53:48 - 8/5/2012  (80032)  (1)
           ● Re: 29 columns - Island Chris  06:27:37 - 8/6/2012  (80034)  (1)
              ● Re: 29 columns - Roger Hunter  07:02:40 - 8/6/2012  (80035)  (1)
                 ● no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - island chris  05:26:01 - 8/11/2012  (80064)  (1)
                    ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Roger Hunter  07:35:46 - 8/11/2012  (80065)  (1)
                       ● Re: no increase of M6 quakes at full or new moons - Amit  07:48:35 - 8/12/2012  (80069)  (0)