|
Re: Update – August 20, 2011 |
I have some recollection that there was a peak that looked like that about there. But, I don't make copies of your charts and so the reader has to take your word for it that this is the Aug 15 chart. I think it is the Aug 15 chart, but without someone with credibility (like Roger, or Canie) making copies of charts as they are posted, there is a problem. Follow Ups: ● Re: Update – August 20, 2011 - EQF 18:33:23 - 8/20/2011 (79078) (2) ● always a hit, never an assessment - John Vidale 09:50:31 - 8/21/2011 (79082) (0) ● More Trouble For The Japan Nuclear Power Industry - August 20, 2011 - EQF 19:02:03 - 8/20/2011 (79080) (1) ● Re: More Trouble For The Japan Nuclear Power Industry - August 20, 2011 - heartland chris 06:50:11 - 8/21/2011 (79081) (1) ● Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - EQF 00:00:53 - 8/22/2011 (79083) (1) ● Re: Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - heartland chris 07:50:28 - 8/22/2011 (79084) (1) ● Re: Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - EQF 12:57:52 - 8/22/2011 (79086) (1) ● Re: Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - Roger Hunter 17:18:03 - 8/22/2011 (79087) (2) ● Re: Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - EQF 18:01:08 - 8/23/2011 (79105) (0) ● Re: Are Other People Interested In This Particular Topic - If So Then It Can Be Expanded - August 22, 2011 - heartland chris 06:31:23 - 8/23/2011 (79093) (0) |
|