|
Re: clustering in solitaire |
Chris; To get a different look at this I found all the 6+ quakes in the Pacific area. For each quake I found the first quake which was over 1000 km away and noted the time interval in days. Once they were all examined I plotted the results and got a nice exponential curve. So...what? Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: clustering in solitaire - Skywise 22:21:21 - 8/20/2007 (72482) (1) ● Re: clustering in solitaire - Roger Hunter 22:49:39 - 8/20/2007 (72483) (1) ● 42...John V? - heartland chris 06:36:34 - 8/21/2007 (72484) (1) ● no clear pattern - John Vidale 08:08:54 - 8/21/2007 (72485) (1) ● Re: no clear pattern - Roger Hunter 14:15:38 - 8/21/2007 (72487) (2) ● numbers? - John Vidale 18:21:40 - 8/21/2007 (72489) (1) ● Re: numbers? - Roger Hunter 18:55:45 - 8/21/2007 (72490) (1) ● looks like a Poisson process - John Vidale 19:08:38 - 8/21/2007 (72491) (1) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter 19:32:02 - 8/21/2007 (72492) (2) ● there should not be a peak - John Vidale 22:27:25 - 8/21/2007 (72494) (0) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter 21:11:34 - 8/21/2007 (72493) (2) ● wait a minute - heartland chris 07:01:23 - 8/22/2007 (72497) (1) ● Re: wait a minute - Roger Hunter 09:09:01 - 8/22/2007 (72498) (1) ● I may understand it (sort of) now - heartland chris 15:20:59 - 8/22/2007 (72505) (1) ● exactly (nm) - John Vidale 18:43:01 - 8/22/2007 (72508) (1) ● Re: exactly (nm) - Roger Hunter 20:04:20 - 8/22/2007 (72509) (1) ● check the most anomalous pairs - John Vidale 13:28:03 - 8/23/2007 (72510) (0) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - heartland chris 06:56:13 - 8/22/2007 (72496) (0) ● clear pattern - heartland chris 14:44:38 - 8/21/2007 (72488) (0) |
|