numbers?
Posted by John Vidale on August 21, 2007 at 18:21:40:

It took me a couple of readings to decipher this: "It's an exponential, with zero the highest and extending beyond 30 days (where I stopped plotting.)"

Maybe you could give the values as numbers - I don't see these particular numbers posted yet.

Remember the Sumatra rupture was 1300 km long.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: numbers? - Roger Hunter  18:55:45 - 8/21/2007  (72490)  (1)
        ● looks like a Poisson process - John Vidale  19:08:38 - 8/21/2007  (72491)  (1)
           ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter  19:32:02 - 8/21/2007  (72492)  (2)
              ● there should not be a peak - John Vidale  22:27:25 - 8/21/2007  (72494)  (0)
              ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter  21:11:34 - 8/21/2007  (72493)  (2)
                 ● wait a minute - heartland chris  07:01:23 - 8/22/2007  (72497)  (1)
                    ● Re: wait a minute - Roger Hunter  09:09:01 - 8/22/2007  (72498)  (1)
                       ● I may understand it (sort of) now - heartland chris  15:20:59 - 8/22/2007  (72505)  (1)
                          ● exactly (nm) - John Vidale  18:43:01 - 8/22/2007  (72508)  (1)
                             ● Re: exactly (nm) - Roger Hunter  20:04:20 - 8/22/2007  (72509)  (1)
                                ● check the most anomalous pairs - John Vidale  13:28:03 - 8/23/2007  (72510)  (0)
                 ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - heartland chris  06:56:13 - 8/22/2007  (72496)  (0)