|
|
|
|
| EQ question |
Is it true that foreshocks have fewer aftershocks to them than mainshocks of the same magnitudes? Hope that was clear. Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: EQ question - Roger Hunter 15:46:04 - 7/21/2007 (72250) (1) ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn 16:08:35 - 7/21/2007 (72251) (1) ● Re: EQ question - Roger Hunter 16:25:50 - 7/21/2007 (72252) (1) ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn 17:09:55 - 7/21/2007 (72253) (2) ● not easy to answer - John Vidale 08:22:28 - 7/23/2007 (72278) (1) ● Philosophically speaking.. - Glen 08:58:47 - 7/23/2007 (72279) (1) ● practically speaking - John Vidale 11:22:41 - 7/23/2007 (72282) (1) ● You nailed it... - Glen 18:12:22 - 7/23/2007 (72291) (0) ● Re: EQ question - Todd 17:20:43 - 7/21/2007 (72254) (2) ● aftershocks - heartland chris 11:58:04 - 7/22/2007 (72268) (2) ● Re: aftershocks - Skywise 22:18:49 - 7/22/2007 (72276) (1) ● Re: aftershocks - Cathryn 15:56:52 - 7/25/2007 (72296) (0) ● Re: aftershocks - Todd 17:27:58 - 7/22/2007 (72269) (1) ● Re: aftershocks - Todd 17:29:57 - 7/22/2007 (72270) (1) ● Re: aftershocks - Cathryn 11:36:57 - 7/23/2007 (72284) (0) ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn 18:09:40 - 7/21/2007 (72255) (2) ● Re: EQ question - Todd 02:09:05 - 7/22/2007 (72265) (1) ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn 11:33:10 - 7/23/2007 (72283) (0) ● Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn 18:24:30 - 7/21/2007 (72256) (1) ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Roger Hunter 18:30:59 - 7/21/2007 (72257) (1) ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn 18:51:59 - 7/21/2007 (72259) (0) |
|
|
|
|
