Re: EQ question
Posted by Todd on July 21, 2007 at 17:20:43:

Yes I remember vivdly that the FIRST 5+ foreshock to Loma Prieta had NO aftershocks. The USGS was open to the fact that they though this was very concerning and did issue a warnning for the next 7 days that the bay area might experience a 6+ quake. Sure enough it happened just now in the 7 days they said it would. I have followed quake patterns enough to know it is odd that this one quake has had very little aftershock activity. If you remember back to December when there were a few 3s in the same area, there was a robust pattern of aftershocks. In fact, its been my observation that most if not all 4+ CA quakes have at least 10-30 1-2 range aftershocks and maybe a 3. So Catheryn, I totally see what you asking...all very interesting.


Follow Ups:
     ● aftershocks - heartland chris  11:58:04 - 7/22/2007  (72268)  (2)
        ● Re: aftershocks - Skywise  22:18:49 - 7/22/2007  (72276)  (1)
           ● Re: aftershocks - Cathryn  15:56:52 - 7/25/2007  (72296)  (0)
        ● Re: aftershocks - Todd  17:27:58 - 7/22/2007  (72269)  (1)
           ● Re: aftershocks - Todd  17:29:57 - 7/22/2007  (72270)  (1)
              ● Re: aftershocks - Cathryn  11:36:57 - 7/23/2007  (72284)  (0)
     ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn  18:09:40 - 7/21/2007  (72255)  (2)
        ● Re: EQ question - Todd  02:09:05 - 7/22/2007  (72265)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn  11:33:10 - 7/23/2007  (72283)  (0)
        ● Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn  18:24:30 - 7/21/2007  (72256)  (1)
           ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Roger Hunter  18:30:59 - 7/21/2007  (72257)  (1)
              ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn  18:51:59 - 7/21/2007  (72259)  (0)