Re: EQ question
Posted by Cathryn on July 21, 2007 at 18:09:40:

Hi Todd!

Long time. But weren't the two foreshocks to LP separated by a little over a year? What happened within 7 days of the first foreshock? Certainly nothing in the 6's.

I am glad you got my questions and have also noticed an astounding lack of aftershocks (and paltry ones at that) after this 4.2 in Oakland. Not that a 4.2 is all that significant, but on the N. segment of the Hayward Fault after nothing that strong going on there since ???, I think it stands out as somewhat ominous.

Not trying to monger fear, here. I was just astonished that it took over 24 hours for the first little aftershock to come in.

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQ question - Todd  02:09:05 - 7/22/2007  (72265)  (1)
        ● Re: EQ question - Cathryn  11:33:10 - 7/23/2007  (72283)  (0)
     ● Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn  18:24:30 - 7/21/2007  (72256)  (1)
        ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Roger Hunter  18:30:59 - 7/21/2007  (72257)  (1)
           ● Re: Now it gets more interesting - Cathryn  18:51:59 - 7/21/2007  (72259)  (0)