Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter
Posted by dib on March 03, 2001 at 14:08:24:

The consensus among geologists seems to be that deep-level earthquakes usually don't have aftershocks. It may be that foreshocks are less common also.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - Cathryn  17:45:57 - 3/3/2001  (5711)  (1)
        ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - dib  21:02:31 - 3/3/2001  (5716)  (1)
           ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - Cathryn  23:19:14 - 3/3/2001  (5718)  (3)
              ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - Don in Hollister  11:11:04 - 3/4/2001  (5725)  (1)
                 ● Foreshock aftershocks - Cathryn  12:58:37 - 3/4/2001  (5727)  (1)
                    ● Re: Foreshock aftershocks - Don in Hollister  17:12:45 - 3/4/2001  (5732)  (1)
                       ● Re: Foreshock aftershocks - Cathryn  21:16:20 - 3/4/2001  (5753)  (0)
              ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - Canie  10:59:13 - 3/4/2001  (5724)  (1)
                 ● PS on foreshocks etc. for all - Cathryn  13:11:09 - 3/4/2001  (5728)  (0)
              ● Re: Washinton quake history for the 6.8M epicenter - dib  10:31:45 - 3/4/2001  (5723)  (0)