Re: Lowell Whiteside pops in
Posted by Skywise on March 20, 2006 at 23:33:03:

Lowell, I don't know if you saw the discussion here a while ago regarding GeoForcasters not being allowed to make predictions in California. What we were trying to determine is what laws were used or interpreted to force you guys out.

Even though I'm generally a quake prediction debunker, I'm very curious about this situation. It strikes me as "totally bogus".

Can you shed any light on this? If not, I understand.

Brian

Follow Ups:
     ● not a lawyer, but - John Vidale  23:55:43 - 3/20/2006  (34986)  (1)
        ● Re: not a lawyer, but - Skywise  14:54:29 - 3/21/2006  (35023)  (3)
           ● my impression - John Vidale  22:01:28 - 3/21/2006  (35040)  (1)
              ● Re: my impression - Skywise  23:47:01 - 3/21/2006  (35044)  (1)
                 ● Re: my impression - Cathryn  16:33:41 - 3/22/2006  (35076)  (0)
           ● Berkland Doesn't Profit From His Predictions - Petra  18:54:12 - 3/21/2006  (35033)  (1)
              ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Skywise  19:50:23 - 3/21/2006  (35037)  (1)
                 ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Petra  20:50:42 - 3/21/2006  (35038)  (2)
                    ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Canie  10:07:48 - 3/22/2006  (35049)  (1)
                       ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Roger Hunter  06:52:27 - 3/23/2006  (35082)  (1)
                          ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - glen  20:22:08 - 3/24/2006  (35108)  (0)
                    ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Skywise  23:43:04 - 3/21/2006  (35043)  (0)
           ● I want to know, too. - Cathryn  15:32:40 - 3/21/2006  (35024)  (0)
     ● Brian.... - Petra  23:52:49 - 3/20/2006  (34985)  (1)
        ● Re: Brian.... - Skywise  14:46:57 - 3/21/2006  (35021)  (0)