Re: not a lawyer, but
Posted by Skywise on March 21, 2006 at 14:54:29:

I understand the issue in the general sense.

But how does this compare to others making predictions that fall within California's borders? I'm not a licensed geologist, nor Petra, nor Stan Deyo, nor many others ad nauseum. Some (not all) are even profiting from it.

Heck, what about Berkland. He *was* a geologist. Is he still a currently licensed geologist in good standing? If his license is expired, then he's definately breaking the law since he definately profits from his work.

Why just pick on GeoForcaster?

I know you don't know the answer, John. But seeing that Lowell is smack in the middle of it all, I had hoped that he could at least point me in the right direction.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● my impression - John Vidale  22:01:28 - 3/21/2006  (35040)  (1)
        ● Re: my impression - Skywise  23:47:01 - 3/21/2006  (35044)  (1)
           ● Re: my impression - Cathryn  16:33:41 - 3/22/2006  (35076)  (0)
     ● Berkland Doesn't Profit From His Predictions - Petra  18:54:12 - 3/21/2006  (35033)  (1)
        ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Skywise  19:50:23 - 3/21/2006  (35037)  (1)
           ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Petra  20:50:42 - 3/21/2006  (35038)  (2)
              ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Canie  10:07:48 - 3/22/2006  (35049)  (1)
                 ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Roger Hunter  06:52:27 - 3/23/2006  (35082)  (1)
                    ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - glen  20:22:08 - 3/24/2006  (35108)  (0)
              ● Re: Berkland Does Profit From His Predictions - Skywise  23:43:04 - 3/21/2006  (35043)  (0)
     ● I want to know, too. - Cathryn  15:32:40 - 3/21/2006  (35024)  (0)