"didn't want to see how it worked"?
Posted by John Vidale on March 12, 2006 at 20:15:49:

I was unaware geoForecaster told state people how it worked. In fact, my impression was that they refused to say how it worked when asked.

And with their widely advertised and overstated claims of success predicting large earthquakes, to say they didn't intend to predict a large quake if it they thought it were coming is curious.

Follow Ups:
     ● Let me restate that, please - Petra  23:10:15 - 3/12/2006  (34764)  (2)
        ● Re: Let me restate that, please - Cathryn  16:41:05 - 3/17/2006  (34876)  (0)
        ● I saw nothing encouraging - John Vidale  23:37:22 - 3/12/2006  (34766)  (1)
           ● About That New Information - Petra  23:52:44 - 3/12/2006  (34767)  (1)
              ● oil seeping out of the ground - John Vidale  00:11:40 - 3/13/2006  (34768)  (2)
                 ● Re: oil seeping out of the ground - chris in suburbia  05:37:47 - 3/13/2006  (34779)  (0)
                 ● Here's Something New - Petra  00:35:56 - 3/13/2006  (34769)  (1)
                    ● one of many possibilities - John Vidale  08:12:03 - 3/13/2006  (34780)  (2)
                       ● Re: one of many possibilities - Petra  20:02:48 - 3/13/2006  (34788)  (0)
                       ● oil in faults - chris in suburbia  14:43:23 - 3/13/2006  (34782)  (1)
                          ● example of oil and quakes - John Vidale  11:39:30 - 3/15/2006  (34811)  (1)
                             ● 1925 - chris in suburbia  13:57:14 - 3/15/2006  (34813)  (0)