About That New Information
Posted by Petra on March 12, 2006 at 23:52:44:

John,

I'll let you clarify this situation. I know you said that "scientists loved precursory earthquake anomalies." Well Tony posted on this board something interesting regarding oil bubbling up in the hills above Santa Clarita. I have yet to hear of any scientist who has taken an interest in this and considering it happened before Northridge, I find it alarming that there is no interest.

I take it that you personally are not interested as I haven't seen any signs of any interest; but what do you think should happen? The earthquake so you can make a correlation after the fact, or figure it out ahead of time?

You're not the only person I have posed this to, there are five others to date. I find it odd, but maybe it's not. I just want to know what if anything is important in the eyes of an earth scientist prior to an earthquake. Does it have to come from an instrument only?

I hope no one ever posts anything about a huge increase in rats coming out in the daytime, because I've heard some scientists would go and see them. Of course, that's the last place they should be; so its more interesting than the oil in the hills. I'm puzzled.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● oil seeping out of the ground - John Vidale  00:11:40 - 3/13/2006  (34768)  (2)
        ● Re: oil seeping out of the ground - chris in suburbia  05:37:47 - 3/13/2006  (34779)  (0)
        ● Here's Something New - Petra  00:35:56 - 3/13/2006  (34769)  (1)
           ● one of many possibilities - John Vidale  08:12:03 - 3/13/2006  (34780)  (2)
              ● Re: one of many possibilities - Petra  20:02:48 - 3/13/2006  (34788)  (0)
              ● oil in faults - chris in suburbia  14:43:23 - 3/13/2006  (34782)  (1)
                 ● example of oil and quakes - John Vidale  11:39:30 - 3/15/2006  (34811)  (1)
                    ● 1925 - chris in suburbia  13:57:14 - 3/15/2006  (34813)  (0)