West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake
Posted by Petra on February 22, 2006 at 17:54:23:

Hi All,

The Challus et al research group has issued a formal earthquake prediction for an earthquake occurring in the region defined as the West Coast with a minimum magnitude of 5.5 to a maximum of 7.0. This prediction was given to Roger Hunter and Don Eck on the evening of 2/20/06 and will expire on 3/20/06 at midnight. The term West Coast encompasses the areas from South of La Paz, Baja, Mexico to the Canadian Border. The prediction itself is precise as to the specific location involved. IE: This prediction does not include Alaska nor any locations 100 miles south of La Paz.

Inasmuch as this is a research project, we cannot deliver a formal public prediction, nor would we in this particular case. I have personally explored every avenue to possibly warn the citizens in the area affected and have determined there is no possible way to do this without creating more problems, some of which could have severe impact on the persons in that zone.

As it has been the standard of this board not to permit discussions regarding predictions which have not been posted here, I am simply making this note to open the door to future discussions if indeed that is something I wish to do at a later time.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Russell  23:48:15 - 2/23/2006  (34218)  (1)
        ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Petra  00:08:50 - 2/24/2006  (34221)  (0)
     ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - PennyB  22:31:49 - 2/23/2006  (34208)  (1)
        ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Petra  23:05:31 - 2/23/2006  (34214)  (1)
           ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - PennyB  10:27:02 - 2/24/2006  (34227)  (1)
              ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Canie  19:51:26 - 2/25/2006  (34295)  (0)
     ● details? - John Vidale  21:09:19 - 2/22/2006  (34146)  (2)
        ● Offer in Compromise - John - Petra  17:40:44 - 2/23/2006  (34203)  (1)
           ● Roger is good enough for me - John Vidale  22:38:51 - 2/23/2006  (34210)  (1)
              ● This isn't an M7 prediction - John Vidale  22:45:09 - 2/23/2006  (34211)  (1)
                 ● Re: This isn't an M7 prediction - Petra  23:02:26 - 2/23/2006  (34213)  (1)
                    ● too complicated - John Vidale  23:15:30 - 2/23/2006  (34215)  (1)
                       ● Re: too complicated - Petra  23:48:41 - 2/23/2006  (34219)  (1)
                          ● do what you want - John Vidale  00:00:27 - 2/24/2006  (34220)  (1)
                             ● Re: do what you want - Petra  00:19:23 - 2/24/2006  (34222)  (1)
                                ● Petra, do you have reading problems - Roger Hunter  06:26:17 - 2/24/2006  (34224)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Petra, do you have reading problems - marc / berkeley  07:43:05 - 2/24/2006  (34225)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Petra, do you have reading problems Yes... My Apology .... And A Volcano - Petra  18:16:59 - 2/24/2006  (34260)  (2)
                                         ● ok - John Vidale  09:14:18 - 2/25/2006  (34262)  (0)
                                         ● Re: Petra, do you have reading problems Yes... My Apology .... And A Volcano - Roger Hunter  18:42:15 - 2/24/2006  (34261)  (0)
        ● Re: details? - Petra  22:20:15 - 2/22/2006  (34149)  (2)
           ● Re: details? - Russell  22:40:52 - 2/22/2006  (34152)  (0)
           ● no details, not a specific prediction - John Vidale  22:27:30 - 2/22/2006  (34150)  (2)
              ● Re: details? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  05:33:19 - 2/23/2006  (34163)  (1)
                 ● Professional Evaluators??? - Petra  06:02:35 - 2/23/2006  (34165)  (1)
                    ● Re: Professional Evaluators??? - Russell  10:00:54 - 2/23/2006  (34170)  (1)
                       ● Re: um, I dunno about that... - marc / berkeley  12:31:21 - 2/23/2006  (34197)  (1)
                          ● Re: um, I dunno about that... - Don in Hollister  13:05:44 - 2/23/2006  (34200)  (1)
                             ● Re: um, I dunno about that... - Roger Hunter  20:47:12 - 2/23/2006  (34204)  (1)
                                ● Re: um, I dunno about that... - Don in Hollister  21:00:21 - 2/23/2006  (34205)  (0)
              ● No comment, n/t - Petra  22:34:05 - 2/22/2006  (34151)  (0)
     ● I concur. - Steve  20:51:07 - 2/22/2006  (34145)  (0)
     ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Tony  18:58:51 - 2/22/2006  (34142)  (1)
        ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Petra  20:23:00 - 2/22/2006  (34143)  (2)
           ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Tony  01:00:39 - 2/23/2006  (34159)  (0)
           ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Steve  21:51:16 - 2/22/2006  (34148)  (1)
              ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Tony  01:10:12 - 2/23/2006  (34160)  (1)
                 ● Re: West Coast Prediction Issued for up to M 7 quake - Cathryn  22:31:15 - 2/23/2006  (34207)  (0)