|
Re: I Have Something Spectacular Planned |
Glen...I don't think the zoo would let you do it...and I tend to think that they should not let you do it. I'd have to think longer about whether the test would work....but I don't think it would....probably too many variables. Also, it could be decades before there was a large quake close to that zoo (meaning, very close). I think a systematic observation of many animals at that zoo, along with many other zoos, would be better. It would have to be something measurable...for example...km/hour of pacing or something. Follow Ups: ● Spectacular Speculation - Ara 07:13:34 - 11/14/2005 (30509) (2) ● Re: Spectacular Speculation - glen 11:03:29 - 11/14/2005 (30518) (2) ● FOR Glen - Ara 19:44:32 - 11/14/2005 (30581) (3) ● Re: FOR Ara - Cathryn 10:04:20 - 11/16/2005 (30646) (2) ● Re: FOR Cathryn - Ara 07:14:16 - 11/17/2005 (30658) (0) ● Re: FOR Ara - Don in Hollister 12:12:06 - 11/16/2005 (30651) (0) ● Re: FOR ALL - glen 22:45:27 - 11/15/2005 (30635) (0) ● Re: FOR ARA - Todd 21:08:10 - 11/14/2005 (30587) (1) ● Re: FOR Todd/Glen - Ara 07:28:27 - 11/15/2005 (30593) (0) ● 1975 snakes - chris in suburbia 13:25:58 - 11/14/2005 (30525) (1) ● Re: 1975 snakes - glen 13:46:15 - 11/14/2005 (30526) (1) ● P vs shear waves - chris in suburbia 09:10:06 - 11/15/2005 (30596) (1) ● Thanks, Chris. n/t - glen 22:48:04 - 11/15/2005 (30636) (0) ● Re: Spectacular Speculation - Cathryn 07:28:45 - 11/14/2005 (30512) (0) |
|