|
Spectacular Speculation |
Chris: "I have my doubts that: a: anyone would want to do this; b: that any clear signal would show up." a) Glen is suggesting the use of monitors. Are you saying that no one wants to monitor animals? b) Glen was talking about monitoring animal metabolism, but you say that you doubt a "signal" will show up. What kind of "signal" are you talking about and what kind of apparatus are you suggesting will not pick up such a signal? Utterly impossible to discern what you are talking about, not that it matters, apparently. "I think a systematic observation of many animals at that zoo, along with many other zoos, would be better." Well, alright. Let us know what you mean by "systematic observation" then. Since I spend a LOT of time in forests observing animals, and in zoos too, I would be very curious to know what you are talking about, if anything. For someone who is surprised that trees can shed leaves without wind, you have some strong opinions (or doubts) about observing animals. Why?
Follow Ups: ● Re: Spectacular Speculation - glen 11:03:29 - 11/14/2005 (30518) (2) ● FOR Glen - Ara 19:44:32 - 11/14/2005 (30581) (3) ● Re: FOR Ara - Cathryn 10:04:20 - 11/16/2005 (30646) (2) ● Re: FOR Cathryn - Ara 07:14:16 - 11/17/2005 (30658) (0) ● Re: FOR Ara - Don in Hollister 12:12:06 - 11/16/2005 (30651) (0) ● Re: FOR ALL - glen 22:45:27 - 11/15/2005 (30635) (0) ● Re: FOR ARA - Todd 21:08:10 - 11/14/2005 (30587) (1) ● Re: FOR Todd/Glen - Ara 07:28:27 - 11/15/2005 (30593) (0) ● 1975 snakes - chris in suburbia 13:25:58 - 11/14/2005 (30525) (1) ● Re: 1975 snakes - glen 13:46:15 - 11/14/2005 (30526) (1) ● P vs shear waves - chris in suburbia 09:10:06 - 11/15/2005 (30596) (1) ● Thanks, Chris. n/t - glen 22:48:04 - 11/15/2005 (30636) (0) ● Re: Spectacular Speculation - Cathryn 07:28:45 - 11/14/2005 (30512) (0) |
|