Re: EQ Prediction Registry
Posted by Don in Hollister on November 08, 2005 at 13:34:11:

Hi All. I would like to put my 2 cents worth in here. I think it should be kept as simple as possible. The prediction should consist of date, location and magnitude. The date would be the most probable date plus or minus 2 days, 3 days etc.

The location could be in latitude/longitude, or a location such as San Francisco and the radius from that location.

For the magnitude I prefer a spread of M=1.5, but there are times I may use a spread of M=2.0.

In my case the magnitude is my chief concern, because it is the one part I never really know. I can only guess at it. To my way of thinking that isn’t good enough, but I don’t have anything else. Take Care…Don in creepy town


Follow Ups:
     ● The Mens Room at Pacbell Park - Michael Tolchard  21:16:31 - 11/8/2005  (30202)  (0)
     ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Petra  18:55:29 - 11/8/2005  (30193)  (3)
        ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - glen  03:19:45 - 11/9/2005  (30215)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  10:48:31 - 11/9/2005  (30220)  (1)
              ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - glen  16:01:57 - 11/9/2005  (30232)  (2)
                 ● Limits - Michael Tolchard  17:36:51 - 11/9/2005  (30241)  (0)
                 ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  16:21:42 - 11/9/2005  (30235)  (1)
                    ● Agreed - glen  18:03:38 - 11/9/2005  (30242)  (2)
                       ● Clusters - Michael Tolchard  19:27:58 - 11/9/2005  (30256)  (0)
                       ● Re: Agreed - Roger Hunter  18:35:21 - 11/9/2005  (30247)  (1)
                          ● Re: Agreed - glen  19:50:37 - 11/9/2005  (30266)  (0)
        ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  21:03:55 - 11/8/2005  (30201)  (0)
        ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  20:32:34 - 11/8/2005  (30196)  (0)