|
Re: EQ Prediction Registry |
Hi All. I would like to put my 2 cents worth in here. I think it should be kept as simple as possible. The prediction should consist of date, location and magnitude. The date would be the most probable date plus or minus 2 days, 3 days etc. The location could be in latitude/longitude, or a location such as San Francisco and the radius from that location. For the magnitude I prefer a spread of M=1.5, but there are times I may use a spread of M=2.0. In my case the magnitude is my chief concern, because it is the one part I never really know. I can only guess at it. To my way of thinking that isn’t good enough, but I don’t have anything else. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● The Mens Room at Pacbell Park - Michael Tolchard 21:16:31 - 11/8/2005 (30202) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Petra 18:55:29 - 11/8/2005 (30193) (3) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - glen 03:19:45 - 11/9/2005 (30215) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 10:48:31 - 11/9/2005 (30220) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - glen 16:01:57 - 11/9/2005 (30232) (2) ● Limits - Michael Tolchard 17:36:51 - 11/9/2005 (30241) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter 16:21:42 - 11/9/2005 (30235) (1) ● Agreed - glen 18:03:38 - 11/9/2005 (30242) (2) ● Clusters - Michael Tolchard 19:27:58 - 11/9/2005 (30256) (0) ● Re: Agreed - Roger Hunter 18:35:21 - 11/9/2005 (30247) (1) ● Re: Agreed - glen 19:50:37 - 11/9/2005 (30266) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 21:03:55 - 11/8/2005 (30201) (0) ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard 20:32:34 - 11/8/2005 (30196) (0) |
|