missing the point
Posted by chris in suburbia on November 02, 2005 at 04:33:00:

Petra....I did not deliberately give myself a concussion...I even note that that was a joke at the bottom of the post. I did accidentally get a concussion. The point was whether or not a CAT scan of the head could cause one to hear eartones...not whether banging your head could cause you to hear eartones. You were involved in this discussion a couple of months ago....you (and I?) may have been proposing that eartones were real (meaning, external) and might be caused by electromagnetic waves. Unlike sonograms, which I think are sound (hence..."sono")..... according to: http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/tomography/
CAT scans are xrays.
To clarify...you think that eartones are external.....and I don't know...have not seen any evidence on this page (beyond your Parkfield prediction and maybe the other one about that time) that they are external but have not ruled it out.
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● EEG - Petra  05:55:08 - 11/2/2005  (29977)  (0)
     ● Oh boy. Another hint of tension.  - Ara  05:13:55 - 11/2/2005  (29975)  (1)
        ● lets just OVER ANALYZE - Todd  11:03:20 - 11/2/2005  (29980)  (2)
           ● Proof that posting is dangerous. - Ara  20:46:58 - 11/2/2005  (29998)  (2)
              ● Re: Proof that posting is dangerous. - Todd  22:43:42 - 11/2/2005  (30002)  (1)
                 ● Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Ara  04:11:18 - 11/3/2005  (30011)  (1)
                    ● Re: Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Todd  15:06:40 - 11/3/2005  (30023)  (0)
              ● Research needs researchers - Petra  21:29:53 - 11/2/2005  (30000)  (1)
                 ● Ear Tones -- field of choice for researchers - Ara  04:32:33 - 11/3/2005  (30012)  (0)
           ● Re: lets just OVER ANALYZE - chris in suburbia  14:07:34 - 11/2/2005  (29994)  (1)
              ● Smiles - Petra  19:25:35 - 11/2/2005  (29996)  (1)
                 ● EEG - chris in suburbia  03:26:17 - 11/3/2005  (30010)  (0)