Proof that posting is dangerous.
Posted by Ara on November 02, 2005 at 20:46:58:

Todd,

"Neither party has said anything dangerous or aggressive to the other."

And I did not say they did.

"Please don't use such a negative tone"

All I said was "Posting is dangerous" meaning misunderstanding can result.

I guess you misunderstood me, Todd. Oh well, posting is dangerous.

On the topic of eartones, it is interesting to wonder what people mean by saying that they are "internal" and not "external", for the tones still remain unexplained.

Are they saying that, being internal, it is a matter for biologists or others to worry about and not them? That is strange, because many people (including Chris) experience eartones. So the "positive" side of this discussion, Todd, is IMO making an attempt to explain eartones (especially the kind that start in youth and are not related to deteriorated hearing). Currently no one has an explanation, and so what shall we do? Any postitive constructive ideas?


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Proof that posting is dangerous. - Todd  22:43:42 - 11/2/2005  (30002)  (1)
        ● Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Ara  04:11:18 - 11/3/2005  (30011)  (1)
           ● Re: Note for Todd: let freedom ring - Todd  15:06:40 - 11/3/2005  (30023)  (0)
     ● Research needs researchers - Petra  21:29:53 - 11/2/2005  (30000)  (1)
        ● Ear Tones -- field of choice for researchers - Ara  04:32:33 - 11/3/2005  (30012)  (0)