Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on October 09, 2005 at 03:29:01:
Petra and all! Thanks to each and every one who shows your love and enquiry on me. I am keeping fine with my family in Coimbatore, Tamilnadu which is around 1800 KMs (approx.) South and south east of the place of quake. Actually I was busy in my Bank due to Executive arrival on yesterday when I was received the quake news. Due to problem in connecting internet, I have seen the posting only after the mid-night after uplinking my web page. Just 5 hours of sleep I was ready to take today's sunshine reading but got only 40% sunshine and my latest prediction is available in my website. Regarding Pak quake, I have totally deny with Petra's view since she referred my old postings. My predictions all related to short term basis and occurred within a time frame of 48 to 240 hours only after the prediction was made. In this particular case if you look into my site, I have not received good sun shine since 28th of Sept.05. But I have got little bit sunshine to make this particular prediction only on 6th of Oct.05. Please note that I gave the magnitude of the quake only 5 to 6M over this place (i.e. NORTHWESTERN KASHMIR - 36.00N 73.10E) which indicates what I have registered was aftershock precursors over the place and the precursor pertains to 7.6M was not registered which may hide in between 28th Sept. to 4th Oct. 05. Hence the variation in the magnitude fixed. But the time frame fixed and the area (just 200 KMs away from the epi-center) was correct. Coming into physics, the circumference of the earth is 24000 miles and takes one rotation in 24 hours i.e. it makes a move of 1000 miles per hour. The fall on sunlight at a particular place from 6 AM to 6 PM approximately over half of the globe per day. Since the earth is moving in elliptical path around the sun in a pre-determined path, the track which is being registered every day and in a full year it looks likes horizontal '8'. Suppose the earth normal path get agitated when it encounters with the external influence caused by planet/s alignment or solar flare activities, it gets deviated from its normal path so that it will reflected in the shadow cost on the wall. From the shadow cost, I determined the strength of force acted on earth which results activate the lava at the core of the earth which moves the earth plates with huge force and tend to stabilize its actual position. So wherever the weak joints in the plate of the earth ultimately receives the force called earthquake. For better understanding, my simple method is working as follows. In normal days the sun shadow costs by an object placed at a distance (say 3 or 4 feet), in a smooth wall constructed in North-South direction, perpendicular to the sky which receives the sunshine at a particular point of time. I make a dot using a pencil. The next day the same time makes another dot and connected each other. Usually due to earth advancement in its path, it gets deviated i.e. moves a couple of centimeter. Then the track looks like more or less in a straight line during normal earth movement days. But it gets deviated due to external force which indicates triggering of seismic activity initiated inside the earth. Location of the quake and magnitude are arriving out of the angle of deviation, time of deviation and shift of deviation. So far I have chased the quakes many times and gave prediction to this board. Accept my failures and success. Some times due to my assumptions due to diffused sunshine I may be wrong. Please note that without providing any support, I am giving my results upto a satisfactory level. If you go through my website, you may notice evaluation of this method by a Chinese expert. Without Govt. or Institution support, at present I am unable to give 100% results as expected by you all. So wait for more predictions in coming days since Mars-Earth alignment is ready to occur in the last week of Oct.05. Hope sun shines for this Shan. Once again thank you one and all. Shan
P.S. Comments are welcome but be patient since my reply will be delayed due to lack of time.
Follow Ups:
● Angle, time, and shift -- definitions? - Ara 06:13:11 - 10/10/2005 (29181) (1)
● do not - chris in suburbia 09:31:37 - 10/10/2005 (29186) (1)
● Re: do not understand Shan's method - Ara 22:46:17 - 10/14/2005 (29381) (2)
● Re: do not understand Shan's method - R.Shanmugasundaram 08:02:36 - 10/16/2005 (29404) (1)
● Shan & Ara: simultaneous posting - Ara 08:18:42 - 10/16/2005 (29408) (0)
● Re: do not understand Shan's method - chris in suburbia 05:15:20 - 10/16/2005 (29403) (1)
● Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - Ara 08:04:06 - 10/16/2005 (29407) (2)
● Re: Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - R.Shanmugasundaram 23:20:02 - 10/16/2005 (29429) (0)
● Shan's method - Roger Hunter 08:58:10 - 10/16/2005 (29409) (1)
● Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara 21:42:05 - 10/17/2005 (29434) (1)
● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter 07:43:43 - 10/18/2005 (29447) (1)
● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara 11:00:30 - 10/18/2005 (29453) (2)
● will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram 23:31:49 - 10/18/2005 (29506) (1)
● Re: will you please....... - Ara 04:04:21 - 10/19/2005 (29509) (1)
● Re: will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram 05:03:46 - 10/19/2005 (29514) (0)
● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter 11:55:28 - 10/18/2005 (29485) (0)
● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - Canie 18:09:59 - 10/9/2005 (29174) (0)
● Glad you are OK (7.5M Quake at Pak) - canary 10:17:17 - 10/9/2005 (29157) (0)
● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - glen 07:50:11 - 10/9/2005 (29148) (1)
● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - R.Shanmugasundaram 02:51:25 - 10/10/2005 (29177) (0)
|