7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on October 09, 2005 at 03:29:01:

Petra and all!

Thanks to each and every one who shows your love and enquiry on me. I am keeping
fine with my family in Coimbatore, Tamilnadu which is around 1800 KMs (approx.)
South and south east of the place of quake.

Actually I was busy in my Bank due to Executive arrival on yesterday when I was
received the quake news. Due to problem in connecting internet, I have seen the
posting only after the mid-night after uplinking my web page. Just 5 hours of sleep
I was ready to take today's sunshine reading but got only 40% sunshine and my
latest prediction is available in my website.

Regarding Pak quake, I have totally deny with Petra's view since she referred my old
postings. My predictions all related to short term basis and occurred within a time
frame of 48 to 240 hours only after the prediction was made. In this particular case
if you look into my site, I have not received good sun shine since 28th of Sept.05.
But I have got little bit sunshine to make this particular prediction only on 6th of
Oct.05. Please note that I gave the magnitude of the quake only 5 to 6M over this place
(i.e. NORTHWESTERN KASHMIR - 36.00N 73.10E) which indicates what I have registered was
aftershock precursors over the place and the precursor pertains to 7.6M was not registered
which may hide in between 28th Sept. to 4th Oct. 05. Hence the variation in the magnitude
fixed. But the time frame fixed and the area (just 200 KMs away from the epi-center)
was correct.

Coming into physics, the circumference of the earth is 24000 miles and takes one rotation
in 24 hours i.e. it makes a move of 1000 miles per hour. The fall on sunlight at a particular
place from 6 AM to 6 PM approximately over half of the globe per day. Since the earth is
moving in elliptical path around the sun in a pre-determined path, the track which is being
registered every day and in a full year it looks likes horizontal '8'. Suppose the earth normal
path get agitated when it encounters with the external influence caused by planet/s alignment
or solar flare activities, it gets deviated from its normal path so that it will reflected in
the shadow cost on the wall. From the shadow cost, I determined the strength of force acted on
earth which results activate the lava at the core of the earth which moves the earth plates with
huge force and tend to stabilize its actual position. So wherever the weak joints in the plate
of the earth ultimately receives the force called earthquake.

For better understanding, my simple method is working as follows.

In normal days the sun shadow costs by an object placed at a distance (say 3 or 4 feet), in a
smooth wall constructed in North-South direction, perpendicular to the sky which receives the
sunshine at a particular point of time. I make a dot using a pencil. The next day the same
time makes another dot and connected each other. Usually due to earth advancement in its path,
it gets deviated i.e. moves a couple of centimeter. Then the track looks like more or
less in a straight line during normal earth movement days. But it gets deviated due to external
force which indicates triggering of seismic activity initiated inside the earth. Location of
the quake and magnitude are arriving out of the angle of deviation, time of deviation and shift
of deviation.

So far I have chased the quakes many times and gave prediction to this board. Accept my failures
and success. Some times due to my assumptions due to diffused sunshine I may be wrong. Please
note that without providing any support, I am giving my results upto a satisfactory level.
If you go through my website, you may notice evaluation of this method by a Chinese expert.

Without Govt. or Institution support, at present I am unable to give 100% results as expected by
you all.

So wait for more predictions in coming days since Mars-Earth alignment is ready to occur in the
last week of Oct.05. Hope sun shines for this Shan.

Once again thank you one and all.


Shan

P.S. Comments are welcome but be patient since my reply will be delayed due to lack of time.



Follow Ups:
     ● Angle, time, and shift -- definitions? - Ara  06:13:11 - 10/10/2005  (29181)  (1)
        ● do not - chris in suburbia  09:31:37 - 10/10/2005  (29186)  (1)
           ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - Ara  22:46:17 - 10/14/2005  (29381)  (2)
              ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - R.Shanmugasundaram  08:02:36 - 10/16/2005  (29404)  (1)
                 ● Shan & Ara: simultaneous posting - Ara  08:18:42 - 10/16/2005  (29408)  (0)
              ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - chris in suburbia  05:15:20 - 10/16/2005  (29403)  (1)
                 ● Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - Ara  08:04:06 - 10/16/2005  (29407)  (2)
                    ● Re: Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - R.Shanmugasundaram  23:20:02 - 10/16/2005  (29429)  (0)
                    ● Shan's method - Roger Hunter  08:58:10 - 10/16/2005  (29409)  (1)
                       ● Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara  21:42:05 - 10/17/2005  (29434)  (1)
                          ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter  07:43:43 - 10/18/2005  (29447)  (1)
                             ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara  11:00:30 - 10/18/2005  (29453)  (2)
                                ● will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram  23:31:49 - 10/18/2005  (29506)  (1)
                                   ● Re: will you please....... - Ara  04:04:21 - 10/19/2005  (29509)  (1)
                                      ● Re: will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram  05:03:46 - 10/19/2005  (29514)  (0)
                                ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter  11:55:28 - 10/18/2005  (29485)  (0)
     ● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - Canie  18:09:59 - 10/9/2005  (29174)  (0)
     ● Glad you are OK (7.5M Quake at Pak) - canary  10:17:17 - 10/9/2005  (29157)  (0)
     ● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - glen  07:50:11 - 10/9/2005  (29148)  (1)
        ● Re: 7.5M Quake at Pak - My experience - R.Shanmugasundaram  02:51:25 - 10/10/2005  (29177)  (0)