do not
Posted by chris in suburbia on October 10, 2005 at 09:31:37:

Ara, I'd have to re-read Shan's recent posts on his method to see how much of it makes sense to me....right now, I don't understand the sentence you repost..
Chris

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - Ara  22:46:17 - 10/14/2005  (29381)  (2)
        ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - R.Shanmugasundaram  08:02:36 - 10/16/2005  (29404)  (1)
           ● Shan & Ara: simultaneous posting - Ara  08:18:42 - 10/16/2005  (29408)  (0)
        ● Re: do not understand Shan's method - chris in suburbia  05:15:20 - 10/16/2005  (29403)  (1)
           ● Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - Ara  08:04:06 - 10/16/2005  (29407)  (2)
              ● Re: Comments on comments: skeptical of Shan - R.Shanmugasundaram  23:20:02 - 10/16/2005  (29429)  (0)
              ● Shan's method - Roger Hunter  08:58:10 - 10/16/2005  (29409)  (1)
                 ● Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara  21:42:05 - 10/17/2005  (29434)  (1)
                    ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter  07:43:43 - 10/18/2005  (29447)  (1)
                       ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Ara  11:00:30 - 10/18/2005  (29453)  (2)
                          ● will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram  23:31:49 - 10/18/2005  (29506)  (1)
                             ● Re: will you please....... - Ara  04:04:21 - 10/19/2005  (29509)  (1)
                                ● Re: will you please....... - R.Shanmugasundaram  05:03:46 - 10/19/2005  (29514)  (0)
                          ● Re: Evaluation versus Visual Presentation - Roger Hunter  11:55:28 - 10/18/2005  (29485)  (0)