|
Re: Prediction Hit for Don! |
Canie, from your numbers, if there is a M2.8 nor 3.2 every 70 days or so, and there was a 6 day window, then there is a 1 in 10 or 1 in 12 chance that this is by chance. I'd say "spectacular" is a large overestatement. Shan's prediction of the 8.7 in Sumatra was a much longer shot....although he has had 3 or 4 misses in a row on great quakes since then.... Roger is the only one on this page set up to evaluate predictions...I can't make sense of predictions for M3s....and can't make sense of Shan's predictions for global M5s.... Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Don in Hollister 15:26:53 - 7/6/2005 (26829) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Roger Hunter 16:33:29 - 7/6/2005 (26830) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Don in Hollister 19:34:01 - 7/6/2005 (26833) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Roger Hunter 20:11:47 - 7/6/2005 (26834) (2) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Don in Hollister 20:50:12 - 7/6/2005 (26836) (0) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Mary C. 20:45:00 - 7/6/2005 (26835) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Roger Hunter 20:57:35 - 7/6/2005 (26837) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - Petra 12:45:23 - 7/7/2005 (26847) (1) ● Re: Prediction Hit for Don! - chris in suburbia 04:59:08 - 7/9/2005 (26871) (0) |
|